Nacap Ltd v Moffat Plant Ltd

JurisdictionScotland
Year1987
Date1987
CourtCourt of Session (Inner House - First Division)
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
9 cases
  • Esso Petroleum Company Ltd v Hall Russell & Company Ltd (Esso Bernicia)
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 6 Octubre 1988
    ...to which I have referred includes the following cases: Cattle v. Stockton Waterworks Co… Simpson & Co. v. Thomson" 73Finally in Nacap Ltd. v. Moffat Plant Ltd., 1987 S.L.T. 221 Lord Justice Clerk, Ross in delivering the opinion of the First Division cited with approval and applied the dict......
  • JM v Fife Council
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Session (Inner House)
    • 5 Diciembre 2008
    ... ... Macrae v Reed and Malik LtdSC 1961 SC 68; 1961 SLT 96; 1960 SLT (Notes) 80 ... Nacap Ltd v Moffat Plant Ltd 1986 SLT 326 ... Nolan v MurphyUNK [2005] IESC 17 ... Orr v MetcalfeSC ... ...
  • Devon Angling Association v Scottish Water
    • United Kingdom
    • Sheriff Appeal Court
    • 27 Marzo 2018
    ...[2012] CSIH 73; 2013 SC 202; 2012 GWD 33–663 Mull Shellfish Ltd v Golden Sea Produce Ltd 1992 SLT 703 Nacap Ltd v Moffat Plant Ltd 1987 SLT 221 Palmer's Trs v Brown 1989 SLT 128; 1988 SCLR 499 Slamon v Planchon [2004] EWCA Civ 799; [2005] Ch 142; [2005] 2 WLR 257; [2004] 4 All ER 407; [2004......
  • Elizabeth May Bernadette Rattray Lyon Hand (ap) V. North Of Scotland Water Authority
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Session
    • 22 Febrero 2002
    ...1925 SC 725 and Dynamco Limited v Holland & Hannan & Cubitts (Scotland) Limited 1971 SC 257. In Necap Limited v Moffat Plant Limited 1987 SLT 221, the pursuers were laying a pipeline on behalf of a third party when it was damaged by the plant hire firm who was laying the pipe, and the pursu......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • Tort Law
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Annual Review No. 2012, December 2012
    • 1 Diciembre 2012
    ...relied on Leigh and Sillavan Ltd v Aliakmon Shipping Co Ltd[1986] AC 785 (‘Leigh and Sillavan Ltd’) and Nacap Ltd v Moffat Plant Ltd[1987] SLT 221 to argue that Sato Kogyo needed to demonstrate that it had legal ownership or possessory title to the property. Prakash J distinguished both cas......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT