Nadan v The King

JurisdictionUK Non-devolved
Judgment Date1926
Date1926
Year1926
CourtPrivy Council
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
24 cases
  • British Coal Corporation v R
    • United Kingdom
    • Privy Council
    • 6 Junio 1935
    ...petition. “In the result their Lordships, being of opinion that the petition should be dismissed, will humbly so advise His Majesty.” 1 [1926] A.C. 482. 1 [1926] A.C. 482, 492, 1 9 App. Cas. 117. 1 [1926] A.C. 482. not confined locally to Canada and would contravene an Imperial Act. … “For ......
  • Federal Attorney-General v T & G Mutual Life Society Ltd
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • Invalid date
  • R v Lavender
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 4 Agosto 2005
    ... ... 41 Another important part of the context of s 18 is the history of the legislation. In Riddle v The King 21 , O'Connor J said: ‘The Crimes Act repeals and replaces all then existing statutory provisions, and there alone the Statute ... ...
  • Pianka v The Queen
    • United Kingdom
    • Privy Council
    • 21 Julio 1977
    ...Cruz (Owner) (The Vera Cruz) (1884) 10 App.Cas. 59 H.L.(E.). The following additional cases were cited in argument: Nadan v. The King [1926] A.C. 482, P.C. Reg. v. Bentham [1973] Q.B. 357; [1972] 3 W.L.R. 398; [1972] 3 All E.R. 271, C.A. Reg. v. McDonald (Herby) (1972) 18 W.I.R. 89. Reg. v.......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
6 books & journal articles
  • Canada's "newer constitutional law" and the idea of constitutional rights.
    • Canada
    • McGill Law Journal Vol. 51 No. 3, September 2006
    • 22 Septiembre 2006
    ...Council struck down the federal legislation purporting to end appeals to the Privy Council in criminal matters in Nadan v. The King, [1926] A.C. 482, [1926] 2 D.L.R. 177 (EC.). The decision did not elicit much response in the legal literature, although J.W. Dafoe criticized the decision sha......
  • The many facets of Cook v. Lewis.
    • Canada
    • University of New Brunswick Law Journal No. 61, December 2010
    • 1 Diciembre 2010
    ...Criminal appeals had initially been abolished in 1887 by an amendment to the Criminal Code, later held invalid in Nadan v. The Queen, [1926] A.C. 482. Following enactment of the Statute of Westminster, 1931, which expressly authorized Parliament and the legislatures to repeal or amend imper......
  • The Supreme Court of Canada and judicial legitimacy: the rise and fall of Chief Justice Lyman Poore Duff.
    • Canada
    • McGill Law Journal Vol. 47 No. 3, May 2002
    • 1 Mayo 2002
    ...Parliament did not have the authority to interfere with the Privy Council's jurisdiction to hear appeals from Canada. Nadan v. The King, [1926] A.C. 482, [1926] 2 D.L.R. 177, [1926] 1 W.W.R. 801 (P.C.). Following the Statute of Westminster, 1931 (U.K.), 22 Geo. V, c. 4, reprinted in R.S.C. ......
  • The Supreme Court of Canada.
    • Canada
    • University of New Brunswick Law Journal No. 61, December 2010
    • 1 Diciembre 2010
    ...Judicial Committee Act, 1833, 3 & 4 Wm. IV, c. 41. (U.K.); Judicial Committee Act, 1844, 7 Vict., c. 69 (U.K.). (10) R. v. Nadan, [1926] A.C. 482, [1926] 1 W.W.R. 801 (P.C.) aff'g (1925), 21 Alta. L.R. 193, [1925] 1 D.L.R. 429 (11) Gordon Bale, Chief Justice William Johnstone Ritchie: R......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT