National & Grindlays Bank Ltd v Dharamsh Vallabhji
| Jurisdiction | UK Non-devolved |
| Judgment Date | 1966 |
| Date | 1966 |
| Court | Privy Council |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
2 cases
-
Kina Finance Limited v Morne Industries PNG Limited (2007) SC985
...[1886] 18 QBD 32; Lee v Official Assignee (1903) 22 N.Z.L.R. 747; National and Grindlays Bank Limited v Dharamshi Vallabhji and others [1967] 1 AC 207; Olsen v General Credits Limited [1985] 2 Qd.R. 506; Pettit v Lodge [1908] 1 K.B 744; Reg v Dibb Ido (1897) 15 N.Z.L.R. 591; Te Aro Loan Com......
-
National Trust v Central Planning Auth
...Maurice v. London County Council, [1964] 2 Q.B. 362; [1964] 1 All E.R. 779. (15) National & Grindlays Bank Ltd. v. Dharamshi Vallabhji, [1967] 1 A.C. 207; [1966] 2 All E.R. 626. (16) Official Receiver, Ex p., In re Reed, Bowen & Co.ELR(1887), 19 Q.B.D. 174; 56 L.J.Q.B. 447, considered. (17)......
2 books & journal articles
-
'Born again' in barbados: the theft act, 1992
...light of the Privy Council decisions in Chettiar v. Mahatissee [1950] A.C. 481 and Dharamishi Vallabhji v. National & Grindlays Bank [1966] 2 All E.R. 626, the decision in Trimble v. Hill (1879) 5 App. Cas. 342 need no longer be followed. See also A.D. Burgess, "Judicial Precedent in the We......
-
Provocation—Does Paria Add Anything Useful?
...Bakhshuwen vBakhshuwen [1952] AC 1.21 See, e.g., Chettiar v Mahatmee [1950] AC 481, National and Grindleys Bank vDharamshi Vallabhji [1967] 1 AC 207.22 Above n. 13.23 Above n. 13.24 For a recent discussion, in the context of the withdrawal of New Zealand from thejurisdiction of the Privy Co......