Your World of Legal Intelligence
 United Kingdom | +44 (0) 20 7284 8080

National Trust for Places of Historic Interest or Natural Beauty v White

Cited authorities 6 Cited in 23 Precedent Map Related
JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1987
Year1987
CourtChancery Division
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
20 cases
  • Westfield Management Ltd v Perpetual Trustee Company Ltd
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 3 October 2007
    ...which are necessary for the enjoyment of the rights expressly granted 19. For example, Warner J held in National Trust for Places of Historic Interest or Natural Beauty v White20 that use by visitors of a car park adjacent to an Iron Age hill fort in Wiltshire known as the Figsbury Ring was......
  • York Region Condominium Corporation No. 890 v. Market Village Markham Inc., 2020 ONSC 3993
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • 29 June 2020
    ...v. Matthews (1999), 46 O.R. (3d) 21 (C.A.); National Trust for Places of Historic Interest or Natural Beauty v. White (1986), [1987] 1 W.L.R. 907 (Eng. Ch. Div.); Ledrew v. Geist, [1988] O.J. No. 852 (Ont. Dist. Ct.); Lafferty v. Brindley, 2001 CanLII 2578 (Ont. S.C.J.), varied on other gro......
  • Das v Linden Mews Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 1 May 2002
    ...contended for by the owner in this appeal. 18 The case put before us that was nearest to the facts of this appeal was National Trust v White [1987] 1 WLR 907. The Trust owned Figsbury Ring, a popular attraction, and had the benefit of an easement over a track leading to it. A car park was c......
  • Colin Oliver and Another v Anne Symons and Another
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • 14 April 2011
    ...Whether a gate is or is not an interference is a matter of fact. The matter was neatly summarised by Warner J in National Trust v White [1987] 1WLR 907, 913 cited with approval by Morritt LJ in another passage of Mills v Blackburn: "Each was concerned ['each' being the cases Cooke v Ingram ......
    • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT