NC v DBS
| Jurisdiction | UK Non-devolved |
| Judge | Judge Wright |
| Neutral Citation | [2024] UKUT 42 (AAC) |
| Published date | 11 March 2024 |
| Court | Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber) |
1
NC v Disclosure and Barring Service
[2024] UKUT 42 (AAC)
IN THE UPPER TRIBUNAL UT ref: UA-2021-000378-V
ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS CHAMBER
On appeal from Disclosure and Barring Service
ORDERS
The Orders of 22 May 2022 remain in place.
One of those orders prohibited any person from disclosing or publishing any
matter likely to lead members of the public to identify the applicant or her
partner (as at February 2021), or the service user in these proceedings.
Any breach of any of those Orders is liable to be treated as a contempt of court
and may be punishable by imprisonment, fine or other sanctions under section
25 of the Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Act 2007. The maximum
punishment that may be imposed is a sentence of two years’ imprisonment or
an unlimited fine.
Between: NC Appellant
- v –
The Disclosure and Barring Service Respondent
Before: Upper Tribunal Judge Wright
Upper Tribunal Member Tynan
Upper Tribunal Member Akinleye
Decision date: 7 February 2024
Decided after a remote (video) oral hearing on 28 September 2023
Representation:
Appellant: Steven Galliver-Andrew of counsel instructed by Fylde law
Respondent: Bronia Hartley of counsel instructed by the DBS.
To continue reading
Request your trial