Neaverson v Peterborough Rural Council
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1901 |
| Year | 1901 |
| Court | Chancery Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
12 cases
-
Bakewell Management Ltd v Brandwood and Others
...authority in the present field." 17 The first decision he referred to was the decision of the Court of Appeal in Neaverson v Peterborough Rural District Council [1902] 1 Ch. 557. He cited among other passages this passage from the judgment of Sir Richard Henn Collins, the Master of the Rol......
-
Housden and another v Conservators of Wimbledon and Putney Commons
...cited in the footnote, along with Rochdale Canal Co v. Radcliffe (1852) 18 QB 287 at 315 (a case on the shorter period). See also Neaverson v. Peterborough RDC [1902] 1Ch 557 at 579 to the effect that a legal origin for a user could not be inferred which would involve illegality, in that ca......
-
Bakewell Management Ltd v Brandwood and Others
...be acquired to do something the doing of which is prohibited by a public statute. The first case cited by Dillon LJ was Neaverson v Peterborough Rural District Council [1902] 1 Ch 557. The first sentence of the headnote succinctly expresses what the case decides— "A lost grant cannot be pr......
-
Wyld v Silver
...inn, wherever that was. It Is true that a recital In a private Act Is not conclusive evidence of the truth of the recital - see Neaverson v. Peterborough R. D. C. ( 1901, 1 Ch. 22). Nevertheless such a recital, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, must be very strong evidence of the......
Request a trial to view additional results
4 books & journal articles
-
The Lands of the Lord
...Huskinson (1843) 11 M and W 827 per Parke B; cf R v Inhabitants of the Tithing of East Mark (1848) 11 QBR 877, 116 ER 701, 152 ER 1039. 40 [1901] Ch 22, [1902] 1 Ch 551. 41 (1890) 45 ChD 504. 102 The Law of the Manor The court held that the ‘main road’ did not extend to the roadside waste a......
-
Table of Cases
...v Silver [1991] Ch 271, [1991] 2 WLR 324, [1991] 1 All ER 449, CA 92 Moser v Ambleside UDC (1925) 89 JP 118 5 Neaverson v Peterborough RC [1901] 1 Ch 22, 65 JP 56, 70 LJ Ch 35, 49 WR 154, ChD 47 Norman and Bird v Secretary of State for Environment and Rural Affairs [2006] EWHC 1881 (Admin) ......
-
Table of Cases
...Cro Eliz 38, 78 ER 303 8.1, 8.3, 24.5 Musgrave v Forster (1871) LR 6 QB 590, QBD 12.5 Neaverson v Peterborough Urban District Council [1901] Ch 22, 65 JP 56, 70 LJ Ch 35; revsd [1902] 1 Ch 551, 66 JP 404, 71 LJ Ch 378, CA 6.6 Neeld v Hendon Urban District Council (1899) 81 LT 405, 63 JP 724......
-
Landowner, Tenant and Occupier
...end, and the landowner has the fee simple in the surface which is no longer subject to a right of passage. 10 Neaverson v Peterborough RC [1901] Ch 22. 11 R (Smith) v Land Registry (Peterborough) [2010] EWCA Civ 200. 12 Under HA 1980, s 263. 13 HA 1980, s 137. 14 See R (Smith) v Land Regist......