Nelson v Dahl
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 13 January 1881 |
| Date | 13 January 1881 |
| Court | House of Lords |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
56 cases
-
Trollope & Colls Ltd v North West Metropolitan Regional Hospital Board
...what I have called their first proposition is well founded I am unable to accept either the second or the third. This is not a case like Dahl v. Nelson 6 App. Cas. 38, referred to by the Master of the Rolls, for there the language used by the parties was susceptible of more than one constr......
-
Bank Line, Ltd v Arthur Capel and Company
...K. B. 372. (5) [1918] 1 K. B. 372. (6) [1918] A. C. 119. (7) [1916] 2 A. C. 397. (8) [1917] 2 K. B. 84. (1) L. R. 10 C. P. 125. (2) (1881) 6 App. Cas. 38, (3) L. R. 7 Q. B. 404, 413. (4) [1916] 2 A. C. 397, 428. (5) [1897] A. C. 609. (6) [1914] 3 K. B. 45. (7) [1916] 1 K. B. 438. (1) L. ......
-
Union of Clerical, Administrative and Supervisory Employees and Others v Industrial Disputes Tribunal & Anpr
...or usage, which it is sought to have implied into the contract, must be notorious, certain and reasonable and not contrary to law. See: Nelson v Dahl— [1881] 6 App. Cas. 38. Yates v Pym— [1816] 6 Taunt 446; Devonald v Rosser & Sons [1906] 2 K.B. 728, at p. 743. 36 Furthermore, the term wh......
-
Sociedad Financiera de Bienes Raices S.A. v Agrimpex Hungarian Trading Company for Agricultural Products; The Aello
...arrived ship, it is "immaterial whether the physical act of loading was possible or impossible" at the spot where she lay. 19(2) Nelson v. Dahl, 12 Ch. D. 568, and Pyman Brothers v. Dreyfus Brothers & Co., 24 Q.B.D. 152, were the most directly relevant of the earlier authorities. The key w......
Request a trial to view additional results