Nethermere (St Neols) Ltd v Taverna
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1983 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Civil Division) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
51 cases
- Sagicor Insurance Company v Carter and Others
-
Synaptek Ltd v Young (Inspector of Taxes)
...Security ELR[1969] 2 QB 173 Montgomery v Johnson Underwood Ltd UNK[2001] IRLR 269 Nethermere (St Neots) Ltd v Taverna and Gardiner UNK[1984] IRLR 240 O'Kelly v Trusthouse Forte plc UNK[1983] IRLR 369 R (on the application of Professional Contractors Group) v IR CommrsTAXTAX[2002] BTC 17 (CA......
-
McMeechan v Secretary of State for Employment
...of giving rise to a contract of employment. That was acknowledged by this court in Nethermere (St Neots) Ltd v Gardiner and Taverna [1984] IRLR 240 and accepted by the majority in O'Kelly's case (see Fox LJ at page 122 and Sir John Donaldson MR at page 123). It will be convenient at this po......
- Quashie v Stringfellows Restaurants
Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
-
Tax Update: A Round-Up of Recent Tax Issues - Monday 7 February 2011
...not require the employer to provide the employee with work in addition to wages: per Stephenson LJ in Nethermere (St Neots) v. Taverna [1984] IRLR 240, at 246. It is only where there is both no obligation to provide work and no obligation to pay the worker for time in which the work is not ......
2 books & journal articles
-
2. The Statutory Floor of Employment Rights: A Bad Case of Subsidence?
...as a possible factor in the equation. The concept was explained by Kerr L.J. in Nethermere (St Neots) Ltd v. Gardiner and Taverna (1984) IRLR 240 as follows: The inescapable requirement concerning the alleged employees, however, is that they must be subject to an obligation to accept and pe......
-
Part‐time Employees: Workers Whose Time has Come?
...courts have have held that homeworkers in certain circumstances are employees, as in Nethermere (St Neots) Ltd v. Tavema and Gardiner (1984) IRLR 240, their employment status is often in doubt and many are assumed to be "self-employed" and thereby excluded from employment protections. 8. Lo......