Nicholas Robert John Salusbury-Hughes Appellant Against HM Advocate
| Jurisdiction | Scotland |
| Neutral Citation | 1987 SCCR 38 |
| Year | 1987 |
| Date | 1987 |
| Court | Unspecified Court (Scotland) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
4 cases
-
Campbell (Thomas) v HM Advocate
...[1981] Crim LR 783 R v Shields and PatrickUNK [1977] Crim LR 281 Reilly v HM AdvocateUNK 1986 SCCR 417 Salusbury-Hughes v HM AdvocateUNK 1987 SCCR 38 Simpson v HM AdvocateSC 1952 JC 1 Slater v HM Advocate 1928 JC 94 Smith v LeesSC 1997 JC 73 Textbooks etc referred to: Renton and Brown, Crim......
-
Elliott v Hm Advocate
...and appeal refused. Church v HM Advocate 1995 SLT 604 overruled;Cameron v HM AdvocateSC1991 JC 251;Salusbury-Hughes v HM AdvocateUNK 1987 SCCR 38applied. Opinion that, in any event, the proposed evidence could not support a plea of diminished responsibility. Observed per the Lord Justice-Cl......
-
Malcolm John Webster V. Her Majesty's Advocate
...which the trial judge had reached could not be reconciled with the application of the correct test. In Salisbury-Hughes v HM Advocate 1987 SCCR 38, the court had applied a stringent test to the reception of fresh evidence in an appeal. The test for its admission current at that time was to ......
-
Elliot v HM Advocate
...the court in Church had been disagreeing with the law as laid down in a number of cases including Salusbury-Hughes v HM AdvocateUNK (1987 SCCR 38). In those circumstances, with all respect to the judges who had sat inChurch, his Lordship was of the opinion that the case should have been rem......