Nippon Yusen Kaisha v International Import and Export Company (The Elbe Maru)

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtQueen's Bench Division
Date1978
Year1978

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
11 cases
  • Whitesea Shipping and Trading Corporation and Another v El Paso Rio Clara Ltda and Others (the Marielle Bolten)
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Commercial Court)
    • 21 October 2009
    ...however speculative, and more than an academic interest in enforcing the covenant not to sue. As Mr Ashcroft rightly points out, The Elbe MaruThe Elbe Maru [1978] 1 Lloyd's Rep 206 at 209–210. The insurer Defendants' objection: the application of Article III rule 8 22 Mr Jacobs contends tha......
  • The 'Starsin'
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 23 January 2001
    ... ... Nippon Yusen Kaisha v International Import & Export Co td (“The Elbe Maru”)UNK [1978] 1 Ll Rep 206 ... not owned by or demise chartered to the company or line by whom the bill of lading was issued the ... ...
  • Homburg Houtimport BV v Agrosin Private Ltd (Starsin)
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 17 March 2003
    ...interpreted this provision as a covenant not to sue, enforceable by injunction, such as was considered in Nippon Yusen Kaisha v International Import and Export Co Ltd (The Elbe Maru) [1978] 1 Lloyd's Rep 206: [2000] 1 Lloyd's Rep 85 at 99-100. All three members of the Court of Appeal agree......
  • Homburg Houtimport BV v Agrosin Pte Ltd ('The Starsin') [QBD (Comm)]
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Commercial Court)
    • 16 July 1999
    ... ... Nippon Yusen Kaisha v International Import & Export Co td (“The Elbe Maru”)UNK [1978] 1 Ll Rep 206 ... understood and agreed that as a line, company or agent who has executed this Bill of Lading for ... ...
  • Get Started for Free