Noble Julius Ofori and Nazar Tackie (No. 2)

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Year1994
Date1994
CourtCourt of Appeal (Criminal Division)
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
6 cases
  • R v G
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)
    • 16 Junio 2011
    ...of the transcript. Counsel for the appellant in that case drew the attention of the court to the decision in Ofori & Tackie (No.2) (1994) 99 Cr App R 223 which had not been cited in Osieh. Counsel submitted that the decision was inconsistent with Osieh. Laws LJ, in giving the judgment of th......
  • R v Hemmings
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)
    • 6 Octubre 1999
    ...is not clear. It is submitted that the dictum is obiter and incorrect and that it is inconsistent with Dixon …, Ofori and Tackie (No 2) 99 Cr App R 223, Ca, and with certain observations in Wells … (at 423E); and Bedwelly JJ ex p Williams [1997] AC… In any event, as acknowledged in Osieh, a......
  • R v Enis Mehmet
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)
    • 22 Febrero 2002
    ... ... Mr Justice Aikens ... No. 2001/01544/X3 Regina and Enis ... That was apparently so in R v Ofori and Tackie (1994) 99 Cr App R 223, in which it is ... ...
  • R v Harris
    • New Zealand
    • High Court
    • 21 Septiembre 2023
    ...The Form of Undertaking/Surety Bond [198] The Form of Undertaking relevantly provides that CBLI undertakes: 61 62 R v Ofori (No 2) (1994) 99 Cr App Rep 223 R v Okolie [2000] All ER (D) 661 (CA). Mr Salmon also referred to Masri v Consolidated Contractors International Co [2011] EWHC 1024 (C......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT