Noor Mohamed v The King
| Jurisdiction | UK Non-devolved |
| Judgment Date | 1949 |
| Date | 1949 |
| Court | Privy Council |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
169 cases
-
DPP v Meleady (No 3)
...PROCEDURE ACT 1993 S3 DPP, PEOPLE V MELEADY & GROGAN 1997 2 IR 249 DPP, PEOPLE V PRINGLE (NO 2) 1997 2 IR 225 NOOR MOHAMED V THE KING 1949 AC 182 1 20th of March 2001 by Mr. Justice Mr. Justice Geoghegan 2 This is a case with a quite extraordinary history. In order to understand it and p......
- PP; Rauf bin Haji Ahmad
- Goi Chin Ang v Public Prosecutor
-
R v Boardman
...suggestion that a certain variety of sexual offences can be put in a special category. In the earlier case in the Privy Council of Noor Mohamed v. The King [1949] A.C. 182 there was criticism of one passage in the reasoning of the judgment of the Court of Appeal in Sims' case. But the deci......
Request a trial to view additional results
10 books & journal articles
-
Table of Cases
...Settlement Society vBritish Columbia [2003] BCJNo 2305, SC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .55Noor Mohamed v R [1949] AC 182. . . . . . . . . . . 78Nova, an Alberta Corp. v Guelph EngineeringCo. [1984] 3 WWR 314, Alta CA. . . . . . . . . . 52O Ltd v Z [2005] EWHC 238. . ......
-
Evidence 1
...that was the ground upon which the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council allowed the appeal in the case of Noor Mohamed v. The King (1949) A.C. 182.” - Per Nageon De Lestang, Ag. F.C.J. in Queen v. Thomas Suit No. F.S.C. 7/1958; (1958) 1 N.S.C.C. 22 at 23-24. (9) “There is no doubt that i......
-
Improperly Obtained Evidence in the Commonwealth: Lessons for England and Wales?
...the courts have demonstrated a willingness toexclude evidence where its prejudicial effect outweighs its probative value (Noor Mohamed vR[1949] AC 182; Harris vDPP [1952] AC 694; Selvey vDPP [1970] AC 304) and a reluctance to sanctionitsuse to secure the exclusion of improperly obtained, bu......
-
ADMISSIBILITY AND THE DISCRETION TO EXCLUDE EVIDENCE
...such as Selvey v Director of Public Prosecutions[1970] AC 304; Harris v Director of Public Prosecutions[1952] AC 694; and Noor Mohamed v R[1949] AC 182. For an overview of these cases in the context of the discretion to exclude evidence, see Jeffrey Pinsler, Evidence and the Litigation Proc......
Request a trial to view additional results