Norgate v Ponder
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 01 January 1627 |
| Date | 01 January 1627 |
| Court | High Court of Chancery |
English Reports Citation: 21 E.R. 775
LORD COVENTRY.
Norgate
and
Ponder
norgate versus ponder. Pasc. 3 Car. 1 [1627], Lord Coventry, An Award was obtained by Fraud, by which the Arbitrators did award, That one of the Parties to the Submission should seal and deliver a Bond to the other after general Releases first given: All which was done pursuant to the Award, and upon a Bill to be relieved it was decreed, That the Bond to stand to the Award, and the Arbitration it self, and the Releases and the other Bond executed by the Parties, should be brought into Court and cancelled.
To continue reading
Request your trial
19 cases
-
Cook v Whitley
...other side, were clearly distinguishable, or if not, had been overruled by Gill v. Shelley (2 Euss. & M. 336). They referred to Stoddart v. Nelson (6 De G. Mac. & G. 68), where the word cousins was held to mean first cousins only, but submitted that the construction there was not at varianc......
-
Brady v Warren
...were also referred to upon this branch:-Sutton v. Moodey (2); Birkbeck v. Paget (3); Paget v. Birkbeck (4); Hilton v. Green (5); Farrer v. Nelson (6).] (1; Rep.., Part V., 104b; more fully, (4) 3 F. & F. 683. Cro. Eliz. 547 (21). (5) 2 F. & F. 821. (2) 1 Lord Raymond, 250. (6) 15 Q,. B D. 2......
-
Hancocke vic. Company v Prowd, Administrator of Yope
...facias upon the judgment of assets in future. Towns. 2d Judgments, 68, pi. 29. See the form of the scire facias. 2 Saund. 219, Noel v. Nelson. 6 T. R. 1, Mara v. Quin. Indeed, where the executor pleads several judgments outstanding, and the plaintiff takes judgment of assets in futuro, the ......
-
Foster v Cautley
...occur, and this presuppose* that the appointment did not leave the portion of the fund not given to Sarah unappointed. 1156 STOOD ART V. NELSON 6 DE 0. M. & O. 68. The decree of the Vice-Chancellor must therefore be varied by introducing the necessary directions in accordance with the opini......
Request a trial to view additional results
5 books & journal articles
-
Show them no quarter: taking the long view, many private companies refuse to be held prisoner by Wall Street's shortsightedness.
...-- Baker & Taylor Inc. Charlotte Richard Willis 4 3 Golden Corral Corp. Raleigh Theodore M. Fowler 5 5 National Gypsum Co. Charlotte Tom Nelson 6 4 Klaussner Furniture Asheboro J.B. Davis Industries Inc. 7 7 National Textiles LLC Winston-Salem Jerry D. Rowland 8 6 Parkdale Mills Inc. Ga......
-
Make it by themselves: bucking trends, manufacturers manage to hold their own in this year's ranking of closely held companies.
...Corral Corp. Raleigh Theodore M. Fowler 4 3 Klaussner Furniture Asheboro J.B. Davis Industries Inc. 5 4 National Gypsum Co. Charlotte Tom Nelson 6 5 Parkdale Mills Inc. Gastonia Anderson Warlick 7 -- National Textiles LLC Winston-Salem Jerry D. Rowland $250 MILLION TO $499 MILLION 8 6 Golds......
-
History, theory and the Constitution.
...Yale L.J. 1825, 1830, 1832, 1835 (1987). (38.) Robert W. Gordon, An Exchange on Critical Legal Studies between Robert W. Gordon and William Nelson, 6 Law & Hist. Rev. 139,181-82 (1988). (39.) Robert W. Gordon, The Politics of Legal History and the Search for a Usable Past, 4 Benchmark 2......
-
Marbury v Madison at 200: Revisionist Scholarship and the Legitimacy of American Judicial Review
...A.F. Westin ‘Introduction,’ in C.A. Beard, TheSupreme Court and the Constitution (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1962 [1912]), 14–24.Nelson (p 6), cites the influence of Clinton’s interpretation of how Marbury’s meaning first began tochange in the late nineteenth century.The Modern La......
Request a trial to view additional results