Norowzian v Arks Ltd (No 2)
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Year | 2000 |
| Date | 2000 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Civil Division) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
32 cases
-
Harding v Wealands
...LtdUNK [2002] 1 All ER 979. Kuwait Oil Tanker Co SAK v Al-Bader (No. 3)UNK [2000] 2 All ER (Comm) 271. Norowzian v Arks Ltd (No. 2)UNK [2000] FSR 363. Phillips v EyreELR (1870) LR 6 QB 1. Regie National des Usines Renault v ZhangUNK (2002) 187 ALR 1. Roerig v Valiant Trawlers LtdUNK [2002] ......
-
Assiscurazioni Generali SpA v Arab Insurance Group
...5(2)(b) of the Trade Marks Act 1994. Robert Walker LJ, with whom Buxton LJ and I agreed, referred to a statement of Buxton LJ in Norowzian v Arks Ltd (No 2) [2000] FSR 363 at p 370, which was approved by at least three members of the House of Lords in Designers Guild Ltd v Russell Williams......
-
Premier Luggage and Bags Ltd v Premier Company (UK) Ltd and Another
...elaborated in further oral argument this morning. Counsel have drawn our attention to the observations of Lord Justice Buxton in Norowzian v Arks Ltd (No 2) [2000] FSR 363 at page 370, approved by Lord Hoffmann in Designer Guild Ltd v Russell Williams (Textiles) Ltd [2000] 1 WLR 2416, at ......
-
Lucasfilm Ltd v Ainsworth
...see Pro Sieben Media AG v Carl ton UK Television Ltd [1991] 1 WLR 605, 612-613. I agree with Buxton LJ in Norowzian v Arks Ltd (No 2) [2000] FSR 363, 370 when he said: 'where it is not suggested that the judge has made any error of principle a party should not come to the Court of Appeal si......
Request a trial to view additional results
3 books & journal articles
-
Works of Artistic Craftsmanship in the High Court of Australia: The Exception as Paradigm Copyright Work
...Lords extended the category of 'book' to ensure protection for the literary record of unwritten speeches) and Norowzian v Arks Ltd (No 2) [2000] FSR 363 (CA) (where the Court of Appeal extended the category of 'dramatic work' to ensure protection for a cinematographic work). Examples of cou......
-
COPYRIGHT AND FICTIONAL CHARACTERS: Shazam Productions Limited v. Only Fools the Dining Experience Limited'.
...the OFDE show, its rights being subsequently transferred to the First Defendant. (4) See Norowzian v. Arks [1999] EWCA Civ 3018, [2000] FSR 363 where it was held (overturning the first instance decision of Rattee J.) that a film can be a dramatic work, Nourse L.J. (with whom Buxton and Broo......
-
The Legal Properties of Film
...per BuxtonLJ).88 Norowzi an vArks Limited (No 1) [1999] EMLR 57 (High Court); Norowzian vArks Limited (No 2)[1999] FSR 79 (High Court); [2000] FSR 363 (Court of Appeal).89 Compare N. Carroll,‘Towardsa n Ontology of the MovingImage’ in C. Freelanda ndT.Warten-berg,(ed s), Philosophyand Film ......