North Australian Territory Company v Goldsborough, Mort, and Company
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Year | 1893 |
| Date | 1893 |
| Court | Court of Appeal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
25 cases
- Burnell v British Transport Commission
- Abdul Khoder bin Shafie v Low Yam Chai
-
Re Orient Networks Holdings Ltd
...Bradford Navigation Co. In reELR(1870), L.R. 5 Ch. App. 600, applied. (2) North Australian Territory Co. v. Goldsborough, Mort & Co., [1893] 2 Ch. 381, applied. Companies-liquidators-locus standi-no locus standi given in Cayman Islands to liquidator of Cayman company appointed by foreign co......
-
Campbell v Tameside Metropolitan Borough Council
...he can be cross-examined on the confidential document, in which case the whole document is to be made available, see North Australian Territory Co. v. Goldsborough Mort & Co. (1893) 2 Chancery 381; Burnell v. British Transport Commission (1956) 1 Queen's Bench 117; more fully in (1956) 2 L......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
Best evidence or best interests? What does the case law say about the function of criminal cross-examination?
...Standards Board, 2015).17. Farooqi,n. 2 at [111]; Baldwin, n. 13 at 178–1 79; NorthAustralian Territory Co vGoldsborough Mort and Co. [1893] 2 Ch 381.Henderson jury that there is a witness available to give such evidence, [which] is inappropriate’ unless the witnesswill be called and will g......