North London Railway Company v Great Northern Railway Company
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1883 |
| Year | 1883 |
| Court | Court of Appeal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
71 cases
-
Gouriet v Union of Post Office Workers
...the court to be just and convenient so to do", dealt only with procedure and had nothing to do with jurisdiction. In North London Railway Co. v. Great Northern Railway Co. [1883] 11 QBD 30, Cotton LJ. said (at p. 39): "If it was intended to give the enormously increased power which it is co......
-
Re Cayman Capital Trust Company
...of Appeal (England), December 1st, 1978, unreported, dicta of Templeman, L.J. applied. (7) North London Ry. Co. v. Great N. Ry. Co.ELR(1883), 11 Q.B.D. 30, dictum of Cotton, L.J. applied. (8) Simpkin Marshall Ltd., In re, [1959] Ch. 229; [1958] 3 All E.R. 611. (9) Siskina v. Distos Cia. Nav......
-
Sibir Energy Plc Applicant/Claimant v (1) Gregory Trading SA (2) Richard Enterprises SA (3) Ferenco Investment & Services Ltd (4) Shaw Invest & Finance Corporation (5) Carroll Trading SA (6) Tranquillo Trading SA (7) Ojsc Siberian Oil Company (8) Roman Abramovich Respondents/Defendants
...Court will not be enforceable in Russia. 2 See para. 7 of Michael Pringle's affidavit (Tab 3 of Index Bundle 6). 3 [1979] A.C. 210. 4 (1883) 11 Q.B.D. 30 at 39–40. See also Steamship Mutual Underwriting Association (Bermuda) Ltd v Thakur Shipping Co. Ltd [1986] 2 Lloyd's Rep. 439. 5 [19......
-
ACC Loan Management v Rickard
...or convenient’ to appoint a receiver in a case of this description. The meaning of this phrase was considered in North London Railway Co. v. Great Northern Railway Co. (11 QBD 30), and it was there decided that the phrase did not justify the granting of an injunction in a case in which no ......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
THE USE AND ABUSE OF ANTI-ARBITRATION INJUNCTIONS
...The Anti-Suit Injunction (Oxford University Press, 2008) at para 11.02. 19The North London Railway Co v The Great Northern Railway Co(1883) 11 QBD 30; Wood v Lillies(1892) 61 LJ Ch 158; Steamship Den of Airlie Co Ltd v Mitsui and Co Ltd(1912) 17 Com Cas 116. 20Malmesbury Railway Co v Budd(1......