North of England Zoological Society v Commissioners of Customs and Excise

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Judgment Date04 October 1999
Date04 October 1999
CourtQueen's Bench Division

Queen's Bench Division (Crown Office List).

Carnwath J.

North of England Zoological Society
and
Customs and Excise Commissioners

Andrew Hitchmough (instructed by Arnhem Tite & Lewis) for the appellant.

Philippa Whipple (instructed by the Solicitor for Customs and Excise) for the Crown.

The following cases were referred to in the judgment:

C & E Commrs v Civil Service Motoring Association TAX[1998] BTC 5003

IR Commrs v McMullen ELR[1981] AC 1

Lopes, Re ELR[1931] 2 Ch 130

North of England Zoological Society v Chester Rural District CouncilWLR[1959] 1 WLR 773

Value added tax - Exemption - Education - Zoo - Whether admission charges were consideration for provision of education - Value Added Tax Act 1994 schedule 9 group 6Value Added Tax Act 1994, Sch. 9, Grp. 6, item 1; Sixth Council directive (Directive 77/388) of 17 May 1977 (OJ 1977 L145/1), eu-directive 77/388 article 13(A)(1)art. 13(A)(1)(i).

This was an appeal by the North of England Zoological Society ("the society") from a decision of the VAT and duties tribunal ([1999] BVC 2015) that admission charges to Chester Zoo were not consideration for the provision of education and thus were not exempt from VAT.

The society was a charitable body which ran Chester Zoo. Its stated aims included conservation and education of the public. Its education division employed six full-time persons engaged on education work and 119 specially trained volunteers to assist the full-time staff when needed.

The VAT tribunal decided that the society did not make supplies of education within the meaning of the Value Added Tax Act 1994 schedule 9 group 6Value Added Tax Act 1994, Sch. 9, Grp. 6, item 1 construed in the light of eu-directive 77/388 article 13(A)(1)art. 13(A)(1)(i) of the sixth VAT directive. The admission charges made by the society were not therefore VAT exempt.

Held, dismissing the society's appeal:

The word "education" could be used in different senses. It could be used in the general sense of broadening the mind and also in the narrower sense of a specific and formal training of some kind achieved by a course or class of instruction. In the context of the VAT legislation the narrower sense applied. Accordingly the society did not come within the exemption: North of England Zoological Society v Chester Rural District Council WLR[1959] 1 WLR 773 distinguished.

JUDGMENT

Carnwath J: This is an appeal brought by the North of England Zoological Society against the decision of the VAT and duties tribunal, sitting in Manchester in August 1998. The question is whether the Zoological Society was supplying "education", in consideration of the admission fees paid by visitors, for the purposes of VAT legislation. The facts were fully set out in the decision and there is no challenge to the findings of primary fact. It is, therefore, sufficient to summarise some of the main points.

The appellant operates the Chester Zoo, which is perhaps the largest in northern England. It contains a wide variety of animals, birds and fishes, all of which are housed in ideal conditions and cared for to the highest standards. The zoo guide says:

The zoo is run to support and promote conservation by breeding rare and endangered animals, by excellent animal welfare, high quality public service, recreation, education and science.

The guide also refers to the role of the education division in explaining the zoo's work to the public, the aim being:

…to improve knowledge and awareness so that visitors can experience and learn about the richness of the animal kingdom.

Although those are extracts from the zoo's own guide, the tribunal accepted that the society aimed to, and did, achieve the high standards of conservation set out in its mission statement, as summarised in its guide.

The education division employs six persons on full-time education work, and they are assisted by 119 volunteer helpers, who assist the full-time employees when visitor numbers so require. The education division also runs a reference library, two craft centres, a special shop and what are called "experience carts".

The zoo's director is quoted in the guide as saying:

Conservation is our prime purpose … [He continues:] Underpinning all of this conservation activity is public education. We want our visitors - all 800,000 or more - to see and support what we do. There is a vigorous interpretation programme with animal and plant identification labels and more detailed information. Multi-media facilities are being developed to provide stimulating, accurate and up-to-date information. A CD Rom is being prepared. We have a programme to help the visually handicapped with tactile maps plus an audio tour.

Each...

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • SAE Education Ltd v The Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue & Customs, TC 03358
    • United Kingdom
    • First-tier Tribunal (Tax Chamber)
    • 28 February 2014
    ...[1999] STC 874 had been cited in SFM and the HIBT case. North of England Zoological 30 Society v Customs and Excise Commissioners [1999] STC 1027 at 1030c, e, and f reminded those involved in construing the terms of the exemption of the need to regard the educational exemption through the p......
  • TC03358: SAE Education Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • First-tier Tribunal (Tax Chamber)
    • 28 February 2014
    ... ... Counsel and Solicitor to HM Revenue and Customs, appeared for the Respondents ... Value ... North of England Zoological Society v C & E CommrsVAT ... set out in [16] above, which the commissioners relied upon as necessary pre-conditions of a ... ...
  • Stuart Tranter t/a Dynamic Yoga v The Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue & Customs, TC 04071
    • United Kingdom
    • First-tier Tribunal (Tax Chamber)
    • 15 October 2014
    ...of the decision the tribunal referred to Carnwath J’s decision in North of England Zoological Society v Customs and Excise Commissioners [1999] STC 1027 and the fact that a narrower sense of education in subparagraph i) of the European Directive provision than the general sense of broadenin......
  • Colin Beckley t/a The College of Meditation v Her Majesty's Revenue & Customs, V 19860
    • United Kingdom
    • First-tier Tribunal (Tax Chamber)
    • 3 November 2006
    ...tuition. 13. The approach of Carnwath J (as he then was) in North of England Zoological Society v Customs and Excise Commissioners [1999] STC 1027 is relevant in this respect. The question was whether an exhibition of rare or endangered species of animal with information designed to improve......
1 books & journal articles
  • Hardware-based ID, rights management, and trusted systems.
    • United States
    • Stanford Law Review Vol. 52 No. 5, May 2000
    • 1 May 2000
    ...(34.) See Sara Robinson, RealNetworks to Stop Collecting User Data: Music Software Will No Longer Transmit Personal Information, N.Y. TIMES, Nov. 2, 1999, at (35.) See RealNetworks, RealNetworks Consumer Software Privacy Statement . (36.) See id. (37.) See Junkbusters, Privacy Advisory on M......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT