Norton v London and North-Western Railway Company
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1878 |
| Year | 1878 |
| Court | Court of Appeal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
11 cases
-
M'Evoy v The Great Northern Railway Company
...that they should part with this right ? In (1) 8 App. Cas. 623. (2) Ir. E. 3 C. L. 333. (3) 21 Q. B. D. 273. (4) [1895] 1 Q. B. 711 (5) 13 Ch. D. 268. (6) L. R. 7 H. L. 283. (7) [1896] 2 Q. B. 439. 336 THE IRISH REPORTS. [1900. (1) 11 Ch. D. 611." (2) 8 App. Cas. 623. Q. B. Div. considering......
-
Wallis's Cayton Bay Holiday Camp Ltd v Shell-Mex and B.P. Ltd
...whether there was evidence on which they could sc find, and the Court held that there was. In Norton v, London North West Railway Co. (1879) 13 Ch. D. 268 the Vice-Chancellor had found that the defendants had abandoned the land in question. That meant in Lord Justice James's words: "not mer......
-
Great Northern Railway Company v McAlister
...v. Kingscote (4) shows that if the words of a grant of a right of way are sufficient to cover (1) L. R. 10 Ch. 586. (5) 9 Ch. D. 623 ; 13 Ch. D. 268. (2) L. R. 17 Eq. 158. (6) 5 Ex. D. 254. (3) 5 Ch. D. 133. (7) 27 Ch. D. 665. (4) 6 M. & W. 174. 596 THE IRISH REPORTS. [1897. V.-C. a new mod......
-
Victor and Others v West Bank Estates Ltd
...legal possession. (See Abdool Rohoman Khan v. Boodhan Maraj, 1930 L.R.B.G. 9, and also Norton v. London North-West Raihvay Company, [1897] 13 Ch. D 268, and Marshall v. Taylor, [1895] 1 Ch. 641)”. 27 Before the 1952 Ordinance came into force, the position was governed by the Civil Law of B......
Request a trial to view additional results