Norton v Yates
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1906 |
| Year | 1906 |
| Court | King's Bench Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
10 cases
-
Professional Inspection Services Ltd v Jokhan General Contractors Ltd ((in Receivership))
...make a third party debt order unless the debenture holder takes some step to turn his security from a floating into a fixed charge. 8 In Norton v Yates 2, the court held that: [T]he true effect of the garnishee order is not to transfer the debt, but to give a right to the garnishee to say t......
-
John Forster Emmott v Michael Wilson & Partners Ltd
...that does not affect my conclusions set out above which do not turn on the details of the charge or how it became enforceable. Second is Norton v Yates [1906] 1 KB 112 which was an interpleader case, dealing with a third party claiming to be a creditor who claimed the money in question by r......
-
Federal Business Development Bank v. Prince Albert Fashion Bin Ltd., Prince Albert Credit Union Ltd. and Kawula, (1983) 22 Sask.R. 111 (CA)
...It was there held that the security had become specific and that the debenture-holder was entitled to succeed. In Norton v. Yates, [1906] 1 K.B. 112, judgment was obtained against a company, and on the same day the judgment creditor obtained and served a garnishee order nisi upon garnishees......
-
Cominco American Inc. v. Duval, [1993] B.C.T.C. Uned. E96
...court under it will have the effect of placing any property of a judgment debtor beyond that person's power. In Norton v. Yates, [1906] 1 K.B. 112 at 121, relied upon by the Court of Appeal of this province in Anderson v. Dawber, supra, Warrington J. clarified this point, stating that:......
Request a trial to view additional results