Norwood and Dennis Case
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 01 January 1687 |
| Date | 01 January 1687 |
| Court | Court of Common Pleas |
English Reports Citation: 74 E.R. 294
IN THE COMMON PLEAS.
Quare Impedit.
294 NORWOOD AND DENNIS CASE ILSONARD, 324. case, which Anderson granted, but Periam doubted of it ; and be said, guardian in socage hath such an estate in the reversion that he may enter for a condition broken : Anderson, The same is not in respect of any estate that he bath, but in the name and right of the heir, and not by reason of any reversion. Ow. 45. 56. Hutt. 105. Ant, 158. Ante. 303. TRIN. 31 ELIZ. IN THE COMMON PLEAS, COCCLV. NORWOOD AND DENNIS CASE. Quare Impedit. In a quare impedit by Norwood against Dennis, the issue was, if the advowson was appendant to the manor of D. or in gross, and the jury found that it was appendant, and further found, that the Queen had right, and title to present, for she had presented at the two last avoidances. Anderson and Periam Justices, If it appeareth unto the Court upon the pleading, that the King hath title to present. The Court shall award a writ to the bishop for the King, but here appeareth no title for the Queen upon the pleading, but only upon the verdict, so as the one part or the other may answer to it : and because the jury have found for the plaintiff, the title found for the Queen shall not be respected, but as a meer nugation and surplusage, for the same was out of their issue, and their charge, and it is no more then if one comes into the Court, and informs us of any title for the Queen, there the Court ought not to regard it. TRIN. 31 ELIZ, IN THE COMMON PLEAS. CCCCLVI GREEN AND THE HUNDRED OF BUCCLE-CHU RCH ES CASE. Action upon the Statute of Hay and Cry. In an action upon the Statute of Huy and Cry, the case was, that Green did deliver a certain sum of money to a carryer, who put the same (amongst other things) in his cart, and sent a boy of the age of twelve years with the cart before, and he himself stayed a short time in the inn, and afterwards went his way, and before he could get to the cart, the cart was robbed and the money carryed away : the boy made buy and cry, and came unto a justice of peace, and prayed he would examine him, but he would riot, but the carryer himself would not...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Creaven v Criminal Assets Bureau
...& CO (IRL) LTD, STATE V O FLOINN & ANOR 1958 IR 155 MERCHANDISE MARKS ACT 1887 S12 R V SULLIVAN 22 LR IR 504 GREEN V BUCKLECHURCHES 1 LEON 323 HELIER V BENHURST (HUNDRED DE) CRO. CAR. 211 FERGUSON V KINNOULL 8 ER 412 LINFORD V FITZROY 116 ER 4255 HUE & CRY 27 ELIZ C13 R V TRACEY 6 MOD 179......
-
Pinkney v The Inhabitants of East Hundred in the Country of Rutland
...and not the master, for if the declaration states that the master made the oath, judgment will be arrested. Cro. Eliz. 142, Green's case. 1 Leon. 323, S. C. Cro. Car. 38, Bvymund v. Hundred of Oking. Ibid. 336. 2 Salk. 613. And if the master brings the action upon a robbery of two servants,......
-
Ferguson v Kinnoull
...a kind very nearly approaching to judicial; as in the case to which my noble and learned friend has referred, of Green v. Bucklechurches (1 Leon. 323), which was an action against a j ustice for refusing to examine a witness necessary to give the party a remedy under the 27th of Elizabeth. ......
-
Ferguson v Kinnoull
...that of England on this point Innes v. The (a) 3 Com. 249, 250. (6) Courts, B. 15. (c) 3 Camp. 388. (d) 2 Inst. 623. (e) 3 Wils. 121. (f) 1 Leon. 323. (y) 27 Eliz. c. 13. Magistrates of Edinburgh.(a) Orr v. Currie(b) is not an authority the other way ; for the sheriff was there discharged f......