Norwood v Navan
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1981 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Civil Division) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
8 cases
-
Martin Alphonso Dennis Alphonso Ltd Dennis Alphonso Trading as Dennis Alphonso Car Rentals Ltd APPELLANTS v Deodat Ramnath RESPONDENT
...of its use in the owner is not sufficient [See Launchbury v Morgans (1973) AC 127 approving Hewitt v Bonvin (1940) 1 KB 188. Also Norwood v Navan (1981) RTR 457 C.A.I. In the Launchbury case, Diplock J said: I think that the true test can best be expressed in these words: was the [servan......
-
Kern Garrett Francis v Peter Alexander Depass
...vehicle —“ it must be shown that the driver was using it for the owner's purposes, under delegation of a task or duty. ” (At 135) See: Norwood v Navan [1981] R.T.R. 457. 10 In this case, there was no averment made by the defendant, in his statement of case, that at the material time the veh......
-
O'Donnell v Coffey
...Lombard Co. Ltd. [1974] I.R. 142; Hewitt v. Bonvin & Anor. [1941] K.B. 188; Morgans v. Launsbury [1972] A.C. 127 and Nobert v. Navan [1981] R.T.R. 457. He also referenced an Australian case, Scott v. Davis [2000] 204 C.L.R. 333 which concerned an aeroplane). Where the evidence did not sup......
-
Samuel Lindsay v Don Williamson and Others
...that the owner have some direct and significant interest in the purpose for which the vehicle is being used. Thus, in Norwood v Navan (1981)R.T.R 457, a husband was not held liable when his wife used his car to go on a shopping expedition with friends even though he knew that she often took......
Request a trial to view additional results