Notes from the Editor

Date01 December 2010
Published date01 December 2010
DOI10.1177/203228441000100402
Subject MatterNotes from the Editor
424 Intersentia
NOTES FROM THE EDITOR
Guest Editorials
is is t he second issue in a row in which the editoria l has been writ ten by someone
other than the editor. From a strictly private point of view this is a welcome development
because making sure that the journal appears more or less on time every three months
is time consuming enough for a lawyer in private practice without his having to worry
about coming up with an editorial in addition. is does not mean that the editor will
no longer be w riting editorials, but it does mean that he does not wish to establish a
monopoly.
From a more objective point of view, it is also important to give the oor as it were
to people from di erent legal backgrounds or schools of thought. e guest ed itorial
is oered as an opportunity to present an arg ument in short form, for example on a
recent development or by w ay of identifying an area for furt her discussion or
research.
In other words the pa ges of this journal a re not reserved exclusively to those who
have the time to produce full articles or fully reasoned opinions. Valid and publishable
ideas can be expressed in short form and the g uest editorial presents such an
opportun ity.
Cartel Crime
e cartel crime series is resumed in this issue with an article from Australia . is sets
out the practical and pragmatic reasons why cartels were criminalised in Austral ia.
ese reasons are worthy of consideration in t he European context.
We a re of course still at the exploratory stage i n th is ser ies since we are still
gathering a nswers to the basic questions as to whet her or not we should criminalise
and if so why.
In t he two issue following t his one we hope to pu nish an article from Japan on
these basic questions and one from Slovenia which wil l tackle the issue from a
criminologica l point of view.
Jury Trials
e journal has, on t hree separate occa sions to date, dea lt with the question of jury
trials and in particular with the dicult ies caused by the judgment of European Court
of Human Rights in t he Taxquet case which suggeste d that juries should give reasons
for their verdicts. e Grand Cha mber has now reversed the initial judgment.
is is dealt wit h in R ichard Lang’s Str asbourg update. Time has not permitted
any more detailed commentar y to be prepared on this judgment.
e jury tria l seems to safe, however, in case there were doubts on that score.

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT