O2 Holdings Ltd's Trade Mark Application
Jurisdiction | UK Non-devolved |
Date | 2011 |
Year | 2011 |
Court | Intellectual Property Office (United Kingdom) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
9 cases
-
Decision Nº O/358/17 from Intellectual Property Office - (Trade market), 24 July 2017
...no evidence is filed it was perfectly proper for the Hearing Officer to rely upon his common sense: O2 Holdings Ltd’s TM Application [2011] RPC 22. 47. Therefore, it was open to the Hearing Officer to find that these two phrases would be viewed by consumers as describing a particular blend ......
-
Decision Nº O/044/21 from Intellectual Property Office - (Trade market), 14 January 2021
...again). However, this does not mean the Hearing Officer’s finding should be disturbed. 50. In O2 Holdings Ltd’s Trade Mark Application [2011] RPC 22, [60], Mr Daniel Alexander QC, sitting as the Appointed Person, explained that: …once an experienced hearing officer has made an evaluation, a......
-
Decision Nº O/669/19 from Intellectual Property Office - (Trade market), 24 October 2019
...as to the usual places where the relevant goods are sold without any evidence being led… 7. In O2 Holdings Ltd’s Trade Mark Application [2011] RPC 22, Daniel Alexander QC, sitting as the Appointed Person, explained at paragraph 60 how an appellate tribunal should treat such findings: In the......
-
Decision Nº O/039/17 from Intellectual Property Office - (Trade market), 30 January 2017
...plc [2008] RPC 919, 938. 27. I also note the comment of Daniel Alexander QC, sitting as the Appointed Person, in O2 Holdings Ltd [2011] RPC 22: 60. In the context of an appeal, once an experienced hearing officer has made an evaluation, an appellate tribunal needs to have very sound reasons......
Request a trial to view additional results