O2 Holdings Ltd v Hutchison 3G Ltd (No. 2)
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Neutral Citation | [2006] EWHC 601 (Ch) |
| Date | 2006 |
| Year | 2006 |
| Court | Chancery Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 7-day Trial
11 cases
-
Lyle & Scott Ltd v Primark Stores Ltd
...in the examples which had been put in front of him on the earlier occasion. 6 Ms. Heal relies on O2 Holdings Limited v Hutchinson [2006] RPC 30, a decision of Mr. Justice Lewison, as illustrative of the court's distaste for this kind of evidence. But there are significant differences betwee......
-
Comic Enterprises Ltd v Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation
...for the same reason. 17 In Fenton v Arcadia, Birss J set out a passage from the judgment of Lewison J (as he then was) in O2 v Hutchison [2006] EWHC 601 (Ch): 16. In O2 v. Hutchison [2006] EWHC 601 (Ch) Lewison J (as he then was) was asked to consider evidence about a survey by an employee ......
-
Marks and Spencer Plc v Interflora Inc. (A Company Incorporated Under the laws of the State of Michigan, USA) and Another
...Ltd. Although not reported, it is referred to in a ruling I gave on the first day of the subsequent trial for trade mark infringement: [2006] EWHC 601(Ch); [2006] RPC 30. I ruled that without expert evidence to explain the survey sought to be tendered, the evidence of eight individual membe......
-
Robyn Rihanna Fenty and Others v Arcadia Group Brands Ltd (t/a Topshop) and Another
...that the regime governing expert evidence today is much more developed now under the CPR than it was before. 16 In O2 v. Hutchison [2006] EWHC 601 (Ch) Lewison J (as he then was) was asked to consider evidence about a survey by an employee of a market research company, and rule whether it w......
Get Started for Free