Oakley v Lyster

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtCourt of Appeal
Date1931
Year1931

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
19 cases
  • Re Ebner;Ebner v Official Trustee in Bankruptcy
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • Invalid date
  • Douglas Valley Finance Company Ltd v S. Hughes (Hirers) Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division
    • Invalid date
    ... ... v. MacNicoll ( 1918 ) 88 L.J.K.B. 601 ; 34 T.L.R. 280 , D.C.; Van Oppen v. Tredegars ( 1921 ) 37 T.L.R. 504 ; and Oakley v. Lister [ 1931 ] 1 K.B. 148 , C.A. applied ... (2) That conversion covered the licence as well as the vehicles, for they were so much ... This definition was approved by Scrutton L.J. in Oakley v. Lyster. F5 ... “Atkin J. goes on to point out that, where the act done is necessarily a denial of the owner's right or an assertion of a right ... ...
  • Bryanston Leasings Ltd v Principality Finance Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division
    • Invalid date
  • Club Cruise Entertainment & Travelling Services Europe v Department of Transport (The Van Gogh)
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Commercial Court)
    • 18 November 2008
    ...the goods as his own or used the goods as his own.” 40 That definition was adopted by Scrutton LJ in the Court of Appeal in Oakley v Lyster [1931] 1 KB 148 at 153 and by Lord Porter in the House of Lords in Caxton Publishing v Sutherland Publishing [1939] AC 178 at 201. In my judgment, ther......
  • Get Started for Free