Oivind Lorentzen as Director of Shipping and Curator of the Royal Norwegian Government v The Alcoa Rambler (Alcoa Steamship Company Inc. Owners)
Jurisdiction | UK Non-devolved |
Judgment Date | 1949 |
Date | 1949 |
Year | 1949 |
Court | Privy Council |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
13 cases
-
Evergreen Marine (UK) Ltd v Nautical Challenge Ltd (THE 'ALEXANDRA 1' and 'EVER SMART')
...crossing rules applied to Alexandra 1 and Ever Smart for the whole of the relevant period before the collision. (Lorentzen v Alcoa Rambler[1949] AC 236 (PC)andCorcrest v Ulrikka(1922) 13 Ll L Rep 367applied; Kaiser Wilhelm der Grosse[1907] P 259 (CA), The Canberra StarandKulemesinconsidered......
-
Evergreen Marine (UK) Ltd v Nautical Challenge Ltd
... ... Teare [2017] EWHC 453 (ADMLTY) Royal Courts of Justice Strand, London, WC2A 2LL ... ”), owned by Nautical Challenge Ltd., a company registered in the Marshall Islands and a laden ... +6 the master reported the collision to his owners saying We hit her…because she stopped outside ... LJ) and Lord Wright's observations in The Alcoa Rambler [1949] AC 236 , at pp. 243 and 250 — ... In SS Orduna v Shipping Controller [1921] 1 AC 250 , at p.255, ... ...
-
Nautical Challenge Ltd (Claimant 131 Defendant 017 "Alexandra 1 Interests") v Evergreen Marine (UK) Ltd (Defendant 131 Claimant 017 "Ever Smart Interests")
...course. In order for the crossing rule to apply each vessel must be on a sufficiently defined course as explained in The Alcoa Rambler [1949] AC 236 at p. 249 per Lord Wright: "The test always is: was what was being done open and notorious to a seaman on the other ship in the ordinary cours......
-
Nautical Challenge Ltd v Evergreen Marine (UK) Ltd
...paragraph 89 of the judgment of Gross LJ). In support of that view reference was made to the dicta of Lord Wright in The Alcoa Rambler [1949] AC 236. With regard to the position of the give-way vessel the Court of Appeal noted (i) that in The Savina [1976] 2 Lloyd's Reports 123 (the last co......
Request a trial to view additional results
2 firm's commentaries
-
Application of the Crossing Rules When in Proximity to a Narrow Channel or Fairway, and the 'Alexandra 1'
...that, for the crossing rule (now Rule 15) to apply, the vessels must also be on suitably well-defined courses (see: The Alcoa Rambler [1949] A.C. 236). The confirmation of the much tested obligation of keeping a good lookout pursuant to Rule 5 of the Collision Regulations. This Rule require......
-
Application of the crossing rules when in proximity to a narrow channel or fairway, and the “Alexandra 1”
...that, for the crossing rule (now Rule 15) to apply, the vessels must also be on suitably well-defined courses (see: The Alcoa Rambler [1949] A.C. 236). The confirmation of the much tested obligation of keeping a good lookout pursuant to Rule 5 of the Collision Regulations. This Rule require......
2 books & journal articles
-
Maritime Collisions
...(The) , above note 21; Maloja II (The) , above note 21; ER Wallonia (The) , [1987] 2 Lloyd’s Rep 485; Lorentzen v Alcoa Rambler (The) , [1949] AC 236; Savina (The) , [1974] 2 Lloyd’s Rep 317 (QB Adm Ct), rev’d in part [1975] 2 Lloyd’s Rep 141 (CA), aff’d [1976] 2 Lloyd’s Rep 123 (HL); Sestr......
-
Admiralty and Shipping Law
...17 The Mount Apo [2019] 4 SLR 909 at [138]. 18 The Mount Apo [2019] 4 SLR 909 at [135]. 19 The Mount Apo [2019] 4 SLR 909 at [139]. 20 [1949] 1 AC 236. 21 The Mount Apo [2019] 4 SLR 909 at [148]. 22 [2004] 4 SLR(R) 89. 23 The Mount Apo [2019] 4 SLR 909 at [154]. 24 The Mount Apo [2019] 4 SL......