Olafisoye v Olafisoye (No 2) (Recognition)
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Court | Family Division |
| Date | 2011 |
| Year | 2011 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
10 cases
-
M v P (Queen's Proctor intervening)
...ER 38, HL(E) Liff v Peasley [1980] 1 WLR 781; [1980] 1 All ER 623, CA Olafisoye v Olafisoye (No 2) (Recognition) [2010] EWHC 3540 (Fam); [2011] 2 FLR 564 Sneade v Wotherton Barytes and Lead Mining Co Ltd [1904] 1 KB 295, Warner v Sampson [1959] 1 QB 297; [1959] 2 WLR 109; [1959] 1 All ER 12......
-
Nazia Parveen v Assim Balal Hussain
...whether to recognise a divorce, was “the need to avoid creating ‘limping’ … marriages”. A more recent example is Olafisoye v Olafisoye (No 2) (Recognition) [2011] 2 FLR 564 in which Holman J said, at [36], when deciding whether to refuse recognition of a foreign divorce under section 53 of ......
-
TI v LI
...spouse knew about the proceedings. 43) Much of the argument before me focused on (4) and (6) above. 44) In Olafisoye v Olafisoye (No. 2) (Recognition) [2011] 2 FLR 564 per Holman J it was said at [34] there are two stages in the approach of the court: first an assessment or judgment whether......
-
Marina Ivleva (formerly Yates) v John Yates
...non-recognition of a Russian divorce that followed proceedings between Russian parties in which both had taken part. As Holman J said in Olafisoye: 82 The judgment of Thorpe LJ, read as a whole, clearly emphasises (as I have myself already stressed) the gravity and undesirability of refusal......
Get Started for Free
