Oppenheimer v Minister of Transport
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Year | 1941 |
| Date | 1941 |
| Court | King's Bench Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
10 cases
-
Decision Nº ACQ 452 2009. Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber), 06-10-2015
...384 Lyle v Richards (1866) LR 1 HL 222 Ali v Lane [2007] 1 EG 71 Haycocks v Neville [2007] 1 EGLR 78 Oppenheimer v Ministry of Transport [1942] 1 KB 242 Hamilton v Clanricarde (Earl) [1762] 1 Bro PC 341, 1 ER 608 Heard v Piley [1868-1869] LR 4 Ch App 548 Worboys v Carter [1987] 2 EGLR 1 (CA......
-
Union Railways (North) Ltd and another v Kent County Council
...compensation payable accordingly (under 1965 Act, s 10). 8 The distinction between an option and an easement is illustrated by Oppenheimer v. Minister of Transport [1942] 1 KB 242. The claimant owned an option to acquire three fields. Part of the fields was subject to compulsory purchase by......
-
Decision Nº ACQ 320 2010. Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber), 30-08-2012
...v School Board for Harrogate [1896] 1 Ch 437 Clark v School Board for London (1874) LR 9 Ch App 120 Oppenheimer v Minister of Transport [1942] 1 KB 242 Marten v Flight Refuelling Ltd [1962] Ch 115 Harris v Flower (1905) 74 LJ Ch Metropolitan Board of Works v McCarthy (1874) LR 7 HL 243 Cowp......
- Perbadanan Kemajuan Pertanian Selangor v JW Properties Sdn Bhd
Request a trial to view additional results