Opq v Bjm

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtQueen's Bench Division
Neutral Citation[2011] EWHC 1059 (QB)
Year2011
Date2011

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
8 cases
  • Re A (Reporting Restriction Order)
    • United Kingdom
    • Family Division
    • 8 July 2011
    ...was exercising its inherent jurisdiction in respect of children. Since the Act, however, as Eady J observed in OBQ v BJM and CJM [2011] EWHC 1059 (QB) at paragraph 18, "the remedy is available, whenever necessary and appropriate, for the protection of Convention rights whether of children o......
  • London Borough of Barking and Dagenham v Persons Unknown
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division
    • 12 May 2021
    ...QC argued that the Courts have always had the power to grant injunctions contra mundum in appropriate cases: Venables; OPQ v BJM [2011] EWHC 1059. The modern foundation of the jurisdiction is s.37 Senior Courts Act 1981. Mr Anderson QC recognises that the Court of Appeal in Canada Goose sta......
  • Aaa v Associated Newspapers Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division
    • 25 July 2012
    ...information which individuals can legitimately expect should not be published", Saaristo at [61]. Elucidating this concept in OPQ v BJM [2011] EMLR 23 Eady J quoted from the European Courts judgment in Ben Said v UK (2001) 33 EHRR 10 at [47]: "Private life is a broad term not susceptible to......
  • Wolverhampton City Council and Others v London Gypsies and Travellers and Others
    • United Kingdom
    • Supreme Court
    • 29 November 2023
    ...where there was a danger of a serious violation of another Convention right, the right to respect for private life: see OPQ v BJM [2011] EWHC 1059 (QB); [2011] EMLR 23. The approach adopted in these cases has generally been based on the Human Rights Act rather than on principles of wider ap......
  • Get Started for Free
4 books & journal articles
  • Interlocutory Injunctions: General Principles
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Law of Equitable Remedies - Third edition
    • 18 November 2023
    ...33. The court also identiied ten principles to govern the exercise of the Venables jurisdiction at para 35. 250 See also OPQ v BJM , [2011] EWHC 1059 (QB), for a history of the Venables jurisdiction. 251 Re, Persons formerly known as Winch , [2021] EWHC 1328 (QB) [ Winch ]. Interlocutory In......
  • Table of Cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Archive The Law of Equitable Remedies. Second Edition
    • 18 June 2013
    ...[1985] 1 S.C.R. 441, 18 D.L.R. (4th) 481, [1985] S.C.J. No. 22 .............................................197, 199 OPQ v. BJM, [2011] EWHC 1059 (Q.B.) ............................................................... 62 Table of Cases 563 Orange and Rockland Utilities Inc. v. Amerada Hess C......
  • Table of cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Law of Equitable Remedies - Third edition
    • 18 November 2023
    ...295, 297 OPFFA v Atkinson, 2019 ONSC 3877 ..........................................................189–90 OPQ v BJM, [2011] EWHC 1059 (QB) .................................................................. 82 Optilinxs Systems Inc v Fiberco Solutions Inc, 2014 ONSC 6944 .........................
  • Interlocutory Injunctions: General Principles
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Archive The Law of Equitable Remedies. Second Edition
    • 18 June 2013
    ...element of the order). 144 Jon Venables v. News Group Papers (30 July 2010), Case No. HQ0004737 & HQ0004986) (Q.B.)[ Venables ]. 145 [2011] EWHC 1059 (Q.B.). 146 See Chapter 3(C)(4). 147 For an example see DFT v.TFD , [2010] EWHC 2335 (Q.B.); and JIH v.News Group Newspapers Ltd. , [2011] EW......