Osborne v Chocqueel
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Year | 1896 |
| Date | 1896 |
| Court | Divisional Court |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
6 cases
-
Draper v Hodder
...that a horse had previously bitten a goat or other horses would be insufficient to fix its owner with liability if it bit a man ( Osborne v. Chocqueel, 1986 2 Queen's Bench 109; Glanville v. Sutton 1928 1 King's bench 29The foregoing rules are so well-established as to amount to legal trui......
-
Quamina v Cherry et Al
...v. E.D. and A.D. Cooke Bourne (Farms) Ltd.[1963] 3 All E.R. 36. 11. Castello v. Smith H.C.A. No. 1774 of 1986. 12. Osborne v. Choqueel[1896] 2 Q.B. 109. 13. Draper and Another v. Hodder[1972] 2 All E.R. 210. 14. Fardon v. Harcourt-Rivington[1932] All E.R. at page 82 (dicta of Lord Dunedin a......
- McQuaker v Goddard
-
Milligan v Henderson
...and Aquarium Co.ELR (1890) 25 Q. B. D. 258, per Lord Esher, M.R., at p. 260, and Bowen, L.J., at p. 261; Osborne v. ChocqueelELR, [1896] 2 Q. B. 109; Baker v. SnellELR, [1908] 2 K. B. 825; Beven on Negligence in Law, (3rd ed.) i. 534, 1 15 D. 486, 2 Macq. 14. 2 Lord Cranworth, L.C., 2 Macq.......
Request a trial to view additional results