Ouellette v Canadian Pacific Ry. Company
| Jurisdiction | UK Non-devolved |
| Judgment Date | 1925 |
| Year | 1925 |
| Date | 1925 |
| Court | Privy Council |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
5 cases
-
R. v. Pitre (M.S.), (2011) 381 N.B.R.(2d) 203 (CA)
...been shortened by the omission of certain cumbersome phrases to make it more readable, as in Ouellette v. Canadian Pacific Railway Co. [1925] A.C. 569. Second, there is the presumption that effect is to be given to the whole of an Act. Not only must the whole Act be read, but every provisio......
-
Abbott et al. v. Canada, (2001) 203 F.T.R. 191 (TD)
...2 S.C.R. 633; 56 N.R. 6; 58 A.R. 2; 14 D.L.R.(4th) 482, refd to. [para. 59, footnote 15]. Ouellette v. Canadian Pacific Railway Co., [1925] A.C. 569 (P.C.), refd to. [para. 60, footnote Canadian Pacific Railway Co. v. R. (1906), 38 S.C.R. 137, refd to. [para. 60, footnote 17]. Somerville Be......
-
R. v. Penfold (E.F.), (1999) 242 A.R. 298 (QB)
...Bathurst Paper Ltd. (1971), 4 N.B.R.(2d) 96; 22 D.L.R.(3d) 115 (S.C.C.), refd to. [para. 53]. Ouellette v. Canadian Pacific Railway Co., [1925] A.C. 569, refd to. [para. Montreal Light, Heat and Power v. Montreal (City), [1924] 2 D.L.R. 605, refd to. [para. 54]. Medicine Hat (City) v. Howso......
-
R. v. Eby, (1979) 33 N.S.R.(2d) 80 (CA)
...of previous legislation on the subject where the words of the statute in question are not ambiguous or confusing: Ouellette v. C.P.R., [1925] A.C. 569, [1925] 2 W.W.R. 494, 39 Que. K.B. 208, 30 C.R.C. 207, [1925] 2 D.L.R. 677, 33 Can. Abr. 543. This should only be done and presumptions shou......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
Table of cases
...107 (Div. Ct.) ............................................................................. 304 Ouellette v. Canadian Pacific Railway, [1925] A.C. 569, [1925] 2 D.L.R. 677, [1925] 2 W.W.R. 494 (P.C.) ......................................... 115 Parlee (Guardian ad litem of) v. Port of Ca......