Owen v Curzon
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 16 December 1691 |
| Date | 16 December 1691 |
| Court | High Court of Chancery |
English Reports Citation: 23 E.R. 753
LORDS COMMISSIONERS.
[237] de term. S. michaelis, 1691, in curia cancellari.e. Case 220.-owen versus curzon. Decembris 16 [1691]. Lords Commissioners. [1] Eq. Ca. Ab. 3, pi. 6, S. C. Administrator obtains a decree, and dies, the administrator de bonis non may revive this decree, within the equity of statute 30 Car. 2, cap. 6. An administrator as such, obtains a decree, but before enrollment, or any further proceedings dies. The administrator de bonis non brings a bill of revivor, to have the benefit of that decree, whereto the defendant demurred, because the administrator de bonis non came not in privity to the administrator, that obtained the decree, but claimed paramount, and therefore could not revive. Per Cur. By the Oxford Act (Stat. 30 Car. 2, cap. 6), after a judgment obtained 754 UNDERWOOD V. MORDANT 2 VEEN...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Abatement and Revivor
...de bonis non may sue a Scire Facias, and take Execution upon a Judgment had in the Name of an Executor or Administrator.) Owen and Curzon, 2 Vern. 237. 7. If a Creditor is admitted by Order to come in before the Master, and prove his Debt, and pay his Contribution, he is intitled to revive ......
-
Bernard John Daly v Patrick Kirwan
...B. 416. Beresford v. ChambersUNK 5 Ir. Eq. Rep. 482. Ferrall v. BoyleUNKENR 1 Ir. Eq. Rep. 391; S. C. 12 Cl. & Fin 740. owen v. CurzonENR 2 Vern. 237. Turner v. DavisENR 2 Saund 148. Blake's caseUNK 6 Rep. 44 a. Harris v.PollardENR 3 P. Wms. 348. Browne v. PerkinsENR 1 Hare, 564. Claridge v......
-
Thomas v Pearse, Esq
...writ, and therefore could not support any action against the person taking them. They cited the case in Vernon, of Underwood v. Mordant (2 Vern. 237), where it was held, that in an action against the sheriff for a false return of nulla bona, if the plaintiff' recover damages against him, th......
-
M'Tiernan v A. W. Bell, Executor of Andrew Bell, and Christiana M'Tiernan, Administratrix De Bonis Non of C. Shadwell
...M'TIERNAN and A. W. BELL, Executor of ANDREW BELL, and CHRISTIANA M'TIERNAN, Administratrix de bonis non of C. SHADWELL. Owen v. CurzonENR 2 Vern. 237. Lord Lucan v. Latouche 1 Law Rec. N. S. 169. CASES IN EQUITY. 193 1841. Equity Eva. APTIE4NAN v. A. W. BELL, Executor of ANDREW BELL, and C......