Padolecchia v Padolecchia (orse. Leis)

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1967
CourtProbate, Divorce and Admiralty Division
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
10 cases
  • Perrini v Perrini
    • United Kingdom
    • Family Division
    • Invalid date
    ... ... Gustin (formerly Law) [1976] Fam. 155 applied ... Padolecchia v. Padolecchia (orse. Leis) [1968] P. 314 not followed ... The following ... ...
  • Teau Ah Kau v Wong Kim Foong
    • Malaysia
    • High Court (Malaysia)
    • 1 January 1998
  • Wilkinson v Kitzinger and another (No 2)
    • United Kingdom
    • Family Division
    • Invalid date
    ...296, [2005] 2 WLR 1124. Niemietz v Germany (1993) 16 EHRR 97, [1992] ECHR 13710/88, ECt HR. Padolecchia v Padolecchia (otherwise Leis) [1967] 3 All ER 863, [1968] P 314, [1968] 2 WLR 173. Petrovic v Austria (1998) 4 BHRC 232, ECt HR. Pretty v UK[2002] 2 FCR 97, ECt HR. Pugh v Pugh [1951] 2 ......
  • Wilkinson v Kitzinger and Another (Same-sex marriage)
    • United Kingdom
    • Family Division
    • 31 July 2006
    ...at para 17R-001), the capacity of the parties to marry is generally governed by the law of each party's ante-nuptial domicile: see Padolecchia –v-Padolecchia [1968] P 314 at 338 and Rule 68 in Dicey & Morris 671 at para 17R – 054. Occasionally, the courts will judge the matter of capacity ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
  • Marriage
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Archive Conflict of Laws
    • 8 September 2010
    ...law, she had the status of a single woman, her divorce from her f‌irst husband being recognized in Israel. 50 45 Above note 26. 46 [1968] P. 314 at 336 [ Padolecchia ]. 47 Above note 43. 48 Padolecchia , above note 46 at 336. Arguably, however, Schwebel v. Ungar , [1964] 1 O.R. 430 (C.A.), ......
  • Marriage
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Conflict of Laws. Second Edition
    • 21 June 2016
    ...note 28. The current wording is: “As a general rule, capacity to marry is governed by the law of each party’s antenuptial domicile.” 51 [1968] P 314 at 336 52 Above note 47. Marriage 411 in a monogamous country with a person who is already married, if either party is already married hy eith......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT