Palmaz's European Patents (UK)

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1999
CourtChancery Division (Patents Court)
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
54 cases
  • Samsung Electronics Company Ltd (Appellant/Claimant) v Apple Retail UK Ltd and Another (Respondents/Defendants)
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 11 March 2014
    ...the patentee to recover damages for infringement of the patent after it had been irrevocably and retrospectively amended. 34 Palmaz's European Patents (UK) [2000] RPC 17 was another case concerning the effect of an amendment made in opposition proceedings in the EPO upon concurrent procee......
  • LG Philips LCD Company Ltd v 1) Tatung (UK) Ltd 2) Viewsonic Europe Ltd 3) Number One Services Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 20 December 2006
    ...whole, it will not offend against section 76 …". 31 31. Assistance is also to be derived from the observations of Pumfrey J in re Palmaz's European Patents (UK) [1999] RPC 47 at 70 and 71. At 70, he said that, following the decision of the Enlarged Board of Appeal in G 01/93 Advanced Semic......
  • Hospira UK Ltd v Genentech Inc.
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division (Patents Court)
    • 21 November 2014
    ...there is no teaching to that effect in the application. It submits that this is an impermissible intermediate generalisation ( Palmaz [1999] RPC 47 and Vector v Glatt [2007] EWCA Civ 805). 170 Genentech does not agree with this. It contends that the proposed amended claims are soundly based......
  • Generics (UK) Ltd v Daiichi Pharmaceutical Company Ltd (Costs)
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 2 July 2009
    ...... (CIVIL DIVISION) ON APPEAL FROM THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE CHANCERY DIVISION (PATENTS COURT) The Hon Mr Justice Kitchin Royal Courts of Justice Strand, London, ... point was sufficiently doubtful that we ought to refer questions of interpretation to the European Court of Justice. . . 48 I do not accept these arguments. Nor do I consider that the ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • Intellectual Property Law
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Annual Review No. 2013, December 2013
    • 1 December 2013
    ...area. Concept of ‘intermediate generalisation’ 19.36 The concept has been described by Pumfrey J in Palmaz's European Patents[1999] RPC 47 at 71 as follows (Novartis at [36]): If the specification discloses distinct sub-classes of the overall inventive concept, then it should be possible to......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT