Parfitt v Lawless

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1865
Year1865
CourtCourt of Probate
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
15 cases
  • Khaw Cheng Bok and Others v Khaw Cheng Poon and Others
    • Malaysia
    • High Court (Malaysia)
    • 1 January 1998
  • Tipper v Moore
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • Invalid date
  • Lambert (plaintiff) v Lyons
    • Ireland
    • High Court
    • 26 January 2010
    ...338 THEOBOLD WILLS SWEET & MAXWELL 16 ED 2001 41 PAR 3-27-29 SHERRIN, WILLIAMS ON WILLS 8ED BUTTERWORTHS 2002 57FF PARFITT v LAWLESS 1872 LR 2 P & D 462 DELANY EQUITY & LAW OF TRUSTS 4ED 2007 CH 16 COSTELLOE ENDURING PROBLEM OF POWERS OF ATTORNEY 1998 3(2) CPLJ 35 CAROLL v CAROLL 2000 1 IL......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
  • When Undue Influence And Mutual Wills Collide: Naidoo v Barton [2023] EWHC 500 (Ch)
    • United Kingdom
    • Mondaq UK
    • 23 March 2023
    ...and confidence. The rationale behind the distinction between inter vivos transactions and wills was considered in Parfitt v Lawless (1872) L.R. 2 P. & D. 462, which does not appear to have been referred to in Naidoo v Barton. Lord Penzance noted that undue influence is not presumed in the c......
3 books & journal articles
  • Wills
    • Jamaica
    • Non-Contentious Probate Practice in the English Speaking Caribbean
    • 21 September 2013
    ...Zaman and Neisha (1969) Law Rep. of Guyana 612. 93 Straker v. Luke (1974) L.R.B.G. 187. 94 Hall v. Hall (1868) L.R. I P & D 481. 95 [1872] L.R. 2 P & D 462 See also Wingrove v. Wingrove (1885) 11 P & D 81 at 83 where Sir James Hannen observed: To be undue influence in the eyes of the law, t......
  • UNDUE INFLUENCE, UNCONSCIONABILITY AND GOOD FAITH
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 1996, December 1996
    • 1 December 1996
    ...of presumed undue influence. The burden always lies on the complainant. See eg Hall v Hall(1868) LR 1 P&D 481; Parfitt v Lawless(1872) LR 2 P&D 462. 34 Bank of Credit & Commerce International SA v Aboody [1990] 1 QB 923 at 961 (Slade LJ); Geffen v Goodman Estate(1991) 81 DLR (4th) 211 at 22......
  • Testamentary Capacity and Intention
    • United Kingdom
    • Wildy Simmonds & Hill Wills A Practical Guide - 2nd Edition Contents
    • 30 August 2019
    ...and the transaction requires an explanation. However, undue influence is never presumed in relation to a will (see Parfitt v Lawless (1872) LR 2 P&D 462). It must always be proved by the person alleging it. This is no easy task as evidence is 30 Wills: A Practical Guide normally scant and, ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT