Parker v Schuller

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Year1901
Date1901
CourtCourt of Appeal

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
67 cases
  • FFSB Ltd (Formerly known as Fortis Fund Services (Bahamas) Ltd) v Seward & Kissel LLP
    • United Kingdom
    • Privy Council
    • 13 Marzo 2007
    ...to rely upon it. 16 First, the summons said nothing about paragraph (h) and referred only to paragraph (j). Mr Smith referred to Parker v Schuller (1901) 17 TLR 299, in which an applicant who had obtained leave to serve out under one paragraph of RSC Ord 11 was not allowed to abandon that ......
  • NML Capital Ltd v Republic of Argentina
    • United Kingdom
    • Supreme Court
    • 6 Julio 2011
    ...not to claim any immunity in that jurisdiction. The contrary conclusion of the Court of Appeal is not readily explicable. Issue 4: The Parker v Schuller point 131 As I have said, in my judgment the point in Parker v Schuller (1901) 17 TLR 299 does not arise. As Lord Walker said in Roberts v......
  • Bowden Bros & Company Ltd v Little
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • Invalid date
  • Virgin Atlantic Airways Ltd v K.I. Holdings Company Ltd and Another
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Commercial Court)
    • 22 Mayo 2014
    ...in the original application to Blair J, but upon which I can, as Mr Flynn accepts, allow reliance, in the light of the disapproval of Parker v Schuller [1901] 17 TLR 299 C.A. by the Supreme Court in NML Capital Limited v Republic of Argentina [2011] 3 WLR 273, at paras 131–137 per Lord Col......
  • Get Started for Free