Parker v Schuller
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1901 |
| Court | Court of Appeal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
67 cases
-
FFSB Ltd (Formerly known as Fortis Fund Services (Bahamas) Ltd) v Seward & Kissel LLP
...to rely upon it. 16 First, the summons said nothing about paragraph (h) and referred only to paragraph (j). Mr Smith referred to Parker v Schuller (1901) 17 TLR 299, in which an applicant who had obtained leave to serve out under one paragraph of RSC Ord 11 was not allowed to abandon that ......
-
NML Capital Ltd v Republic of Argentina
...This issue has been described as the "gateway issue". It involves consideration of the effect of what I shall describe as the rule in Parker v Schuller (1901) 17 TLR 299. 66 A claimant has always been required by rules of court to include in the application for permission to serve proceedi......
- Bowden Bros & Company Ltd v Little
-
(1) Judith Vidal-hall (2) Robert Hann (3) Marc Bradshaw v Google Inc.
...to make a fresh application for permission to serve out. This submission would have succeeded in the past: see Metall at p436E-F and Parker v Schuller (1901) 17 TLR 299. 81 But Mr Tomlinson submits that this is no longer the law. In NML Capital Ltd v Republic of Argentina [2011] UKSC 31; [2......
Request a trial to view additional results