Parkes v The Queen

JurisdictionUK Non-devolved
Judgment Date1976
Date1976
CourtPrivy Council
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
23 cases
  • Josue Celestin v The Attorney General
    • Bahamas
    • Court of Appeal (Bahamas)
    • 10 June 2020
    ...and unsatisfactory. Barrow v The State [1998] AC 846 considered Birbal v. R SCCrApp No. 18 of 2011 considered Donald Parkes v Queen [1976] 1 WLR 1251 applied Hall v. The Queen [1971] 1 WLR 298 applied Peter Stewart v The Queen [2011] UKPC 11 considered R v Cooper [1969] 1 All ER 32 dist......
  • R. v. Hebert, (1990) 110 N.R. 1 (SCC)
    • Canada
    • Canada (Federal) Supreme Court (Canada)
    • 21 June 1990
    ...(1980), 447 U.S. 264, refd to. [para. 107]. Hoffa v. United States (1966), 385 U.S. 293, refd to. [para. 107]. Parkes v. The Queen, [1976] 1 W.L.R. 1251 (P.C.), refd to. [para. Dolphin Delivery Ltd. v. Retail, Wholesale and Department Store Union, Local 580, [1986] 2 S.C.R. 573; 71 N.R. 83,......
  • Petty v R
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • Invalid date
  • Azzopardi v R
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 3 May 2001
    ...63R v Smithies (1832) 5 C & P 332 [ 172 ER 999]; R v Grills (1910) 11 CLR 400 at 408–409; R v Christie [1914] AC 545 at 554; Parkes (1976) 64 Cr App R 25 at 27–28; R v Chandler [1976] 1 WLR 585; [1976] 3 All ER 105; Petty v The Queen (1991) 173 CLR 95 at 64 (1820) 4 B & Ald 95 [ 106 ER 873......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
  • ADMISSIBILITY AND THE DISCRETION TO EXCLUDE EVIDENCE
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 2013, December 2013
    • 1 December 2013
    ...AC 545 at 564–565. 100 The House of Lords affirmed the Court of Appeal's decision to quash the conviction on a different ground. 101[1976] 1 WLR 1251. 102[1995] 3 SLR(R) 404. 103 These provisions are also addressed in para 12 above. 104 Cases such as Selvey v Director of Public Prosecutions......
  • The evidentiary value of an accused’s invocation of the pre-trial and trial right to silence through Anglo-American case law
    • South Africa
    • South African Law Journal No. , May 2020
    • 15 May 2020
    ...case is a weak one, it may in certa in circum stances be st rengthened by the a ddition of a silence i nference.67 R v Parkes (1976) 64 Cr App R 25; Hall v R supra note 10.68 R v Voisin (1918) 1 KB 531 at 537. © Juta and Company (Pty) 320 (2020) 137 T HE SOUTH AFRIC AN LAW JOURNALThe essent......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT