Parkin v Norman
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 1982 |
| Date | 1982 |
| Year | 1982 |
| Court | Divisional Court |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
23 cases
-
Chee Siok Chin and Others v Minister for Home Affairs and Another
...or insulting words or behaviour are simply words or behaviour that are threatening, abusive or insulting in character: Parkin v Norman [1983] QB 92 at 98. As McCollough J held in Parkin v Norman at If the conduct in question is of this character it does not … matter whether anyone feels him......
- Nicholson v Gage
-
Min for Justice v Makuch
...23 CR APP R 49 LYNCH v BURKE 1996 1 ILRM 114 DOUGAL v MAHON UNREP GANNON 2.12.1988 1989/1/92 ROGER v NORMAND 1995 SLT 411 PARKIN v NORMAN 1983 1 QB 92 PUBLIC ORDER ACT 1936 S5 R v WATERS 1963 47 CR APP R 149 CAWLEY v FROST 1976 1 WLR 1207 PUBLIC ORDER ACT 1936 S9(1) PUBLIC ORDER ACT 1936 S9......
-
The Chief Constable of Lancashire and Lisa Marie Potter
...meaning in this context of “more probable than not”. That meaning, it seems to me, is much the same as that of the Divisional Court in Parkin v, Norman [1983] QB 92, which concerned a charge of insulting behaviour “likely” to occasion a breach of the peace. McCullough J., giving the judgme......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
-
Section 5 Of The Public Order Act 1986: The Impact Of Harvey v DPP
...the limitations to be placed upon these words. They are not synonymous with causing annoyance, anger, disgust or distress: Parkin v Norman [1983] QB 92, and it may not be enough that a person's words or behaviour are vigorous, distasteful or unmannerly: Brutus at 862 and 865, or offensive o......
4 books & journal articles
-
A Preoccupation with Perversion: the British Response to Refugee Claims on
the Basis of Sexual Orientation, 1989–2003
...IAT No HX05135–2002, 30 August 2002).Available from EINNorris v Ireland (1991) 13 EHRR 186Parkin v Norman, Valentine v Lilley [1982] 2 All ER 583R (Ex parte Ullah) v Special Adjudicator; Do v Secretary of State for the HomeDepartment [2004] UKHL 26; [2003] 3 All ER 1174; [2002] EWCA Civ 185......
-
Section 5 of the Public Order Act 1986 Reshaping the Future of Free Speech in the United Kingdom: The Rise of a Tyranny
...as a matter of ordinary usage of the English language cover or apply to the facts which have been proved. (Lord Reid). 16Parkin v Norman [1983] QB 92. 17Brutus v Cozens (n 13) 862, 865. 18Peter Thornton, The Law of Public Order and Protest (Oxford University Press, 2010) 36. 19‘“Gay” Police......
-
Recent Judicial Decisions
...could only come from Parliament - and that is very likelyfollowing the Royal Commission on Criminal Procedure.INSULTSParkin v. Norman [1982] 3 W.L.R. 523 DivisionalCourtThis case involved two appeals, both involving homosexual acts in apublic lavatory. In both cases the conduct had been dir......
-
Recent Judicial Decisions
...inappropriate toassumesuch a reaction to a vice officersent on a particular assignment? The point had been considered in Parkinv. Norman [1983] Q.B.92 where a police officer had been importuned andthe conduct was said to be clearly potentially insulting, as required by s.5ofthe Public Order......