Parkinson v Parkinson (Note)

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtCourt of Appeal (Civil Division)
Year1973
Date1973

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
6 cases
  • Cheong Ghim Fah and Another v Murugian s/o Rangasamy
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • 7 February 2004
    ...SLR 189 (folld) Nance v British Columbia Electric Railway Co, Ltd [1951] AC 601; [1951] 2 All ER 448 (folld) Parkinson v Parkinson [1973] RTR 193 (not folld) Powell v Phillips [1972] 3 All ER 864 (not folld) R v Inland Revenue Commissioners,Ex parte T C Coombs &Co [1991] 2 AC 283 (folld) Sc......
  • Kerley v Downes
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • Invalid date
  • Hermione Rose Williams v Stacy-Ann Wynter
    • British Virgin Islands
    • High Court (British Virgin Islands)
    • 30 October 2020
    ...at which he travelled, the warning which he gave and the path of the road in which he directed his vehicle. 95 In Parkinson v Parkinson (1973) RTR 193, the pedestrians were walking 4 feet and 6 inches into the roadway. The defendant was negligent because the pedestrians were well into their......
  • Duke v Thorne et Al
    • Barbados
    • High Court (Barbados)
    • 20 December 1989
    ...duty, nor does it constitute negligence per se attracting damages: Powell v Phillips [1972] 3 All E.R. 864; Parkinson v. Parkinson [1973] R.T.R. 193; [1973] C.L.Y. 3002. 7 Counsel for the plaintiff also contends that on the defendant driver's own evidence of having seen and observed the pla......
  • Get Started for Free