Parkinson v Potter
Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
Date | 1885 |
Court | Queen's Bench Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
4 cases
-
Taylor v Best, Drouet, Sperling and Clarke
...others might be allowed to proceed to judgment, and the judgment be enforced against the other defendants. (I) See Parkinson v. Potter, 16 Q.B.D. 152, 55 L.J. Q.B. 153 ; Macartney v. Garbutt 24 Q.B.D. 368. (2) See Magdalena S.N. Company v. Martin, 2 E. & E. 94; The Parlement Belge, 5 P.D. 1......
-
Sáorstát and Continental Steamship Company v De las Morenas
...[1894] 1 Q. B. 149. (3) [1938] 1 Ch. 839. (4) [1938] A. C. 485. (5) 38 T. L. R. 259. (1) [1918] 2 I. R. 78. (2) [1906] 1 K. B. 613. (3) 16 Q. B. D. 152. (4) [1894] 2 Q. B. 352. (5) [1942] I. R. 148. (6) 9 Ch. D. 351. (7) [1920] P. 30. (8) 93 L. J. K. B. 816. (9) 17 Q. B. 171. (10) 38 T. L. ......
-
The Amazone
...think this appeal is quite unfounded, and it should be dismissed with costs.” (At pp. 46–47.) 1 [1938] A.C. 485, 490. 1 1 B. & C. 554. 1 16 Q.B.D. 152, 1 [1928] A.C. 433, 458. 2 28 L.J. (Q.B.) 310, 315. ...
-
Juan Ysmael and Company v SS Tasikmalaia
...carry diplomatic immunity. In support of this contention he cited passages from the judgment of Wills J. in Parkinson v. PotterELR (1885), 16 Q.B.D. 152 at p. 159 and from the judgment of Lord Phillimore in Engelke v. MussmanELR, [1928] A.C. 433 at p. 449.1 In Parkinson v. Potter, at p. 159......