Parr v Snell

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Year1923
Date1923
CourtCourt of Appeal
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
11 cases
  • Cheow Chew Khoon @ Teoh Chew Khoon Foo Loke Ying
    • Malaysia
    • High Court (Malaysia)
    • 1 January 2005
  • C Inc. Plc v L [QBD (Comm)]
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Commercial Court)
    • 16 March 2001
    ...(“The Ikarian Reefer”) (No. 2) [2000] CLC 22. North London Railway Co v Great Northern Railway CoELR (1883) 11 QBD 30. Parr v SnellELR [1923] 1 KB 1. Partington v Hawthorne (1888) JP 807. Patrick Stevedores Operations No. 2 Pty v Maritime Union of Australia (No. 3)UNK (1998) 153 ALR 643. Pe......
  • The Koursk
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal
    • 22 February 1924
    ...1842, Car. & M., 93, 96 Kendall v. HamiltonELR 1879 41 L. T. Rep. 418 4 App. Cas., 504, 526, 542 Parr v. SnellELR 128 L. T. Rep. 106 (1923) 1 K. B. 1 Cooke v. Gill 1873, 28 L. T. Rep. 32 L. Rep. 8 C. P. 107 Read v. BrownELR 1888, 60 L. T. Rep. 250 22 Q. B. Div. 128, 131 Armstrong v. Lancash......
  • Chan Chiu-hung v Pantex Carment Factory And Others
    • Hong Kong
    • District Court (Hong Kong)
    • 10 January 1974
    ...from the limitation imposed on such actions, by King v. Hoare, 13 M. & W. 494; Kendall v. Hamilton, 4 App. Cas. 504; Parr v. Snell, (1923) 1 K.B. 1. Judgment may be taken against one in default of appearance; against another under O. 14; and against a third under this rule, without prejudic......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT