Parsons v Edward Cottrel
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 01 January 1803 |
| Date | 01 January 1803 |
| Court | High Court |
English Reports Citation: 83 E.R. 208
COURTS OF KING'S BENCH, COMMON PLEAS AND EXCHEQUER.
[399] parsons versus edward cottrel. debt upon an obligation of lOOu dat. 25 febr. 31 car. 2. Intr. Trin. 31 Car. 2. Debt. The defendant pleads, that before the exhibiting the bill, and after the date of the said obligation, viz. 17 March 31 Car. 2, By indenture between John Ely and the plaintiff of the one part, arid one William Cotterel, and one John Cotterel, son of the said William, and the defendant, of the other part, hie in Cur. prolat. the plaintiff released to the defendant all claims and demands ; et hoc, &c. The plaintiff demands oyer of the indenture, the words (as to this purpose) are, The said John Ely and Thomas Parsons, for and in consideration of the sum of 50L to them or one of them paid, or secured by bond lately entered into by the said Edward Coiterel, the RAYM. SIR T. 400. TERM. TRIN. 32 CAR. 2, 1680, B. R. 209 receipt whereof they the said Thomas Parsons and John Ely do, and either of them doth release and acquit the said John Cotterel and Edward Cotterel, and either of them, and their and either of their heirs, &c. and for other good causes, &c. have granted and released to the said John Cotterel, his heirs and assigns, all that messuage, &c. Quibus lectis & auditis, the plaintiff replies, that the bond in the declaration, and the bond mentioned in the indenture...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Craig v Byrne
...Hill v. Montagu 2 M. & Sel. 378. Jƒ€™Anson v. StuartENR 1 T. R. 748. Barker v. ThoroldENR 1 Wms. Saund. 47. Aglionby v. TowersonENR T. Raym. 399. Peytoeƒ€™s case 9 Co. 80. Andrews v. WhiteheadENR 13 East, 102. Thurman v. Wild 11 A. & E. 453. Bro. Abr. Bro. Abr. Tit. Traverse, 179;......