Parvinder Singh (Case reference: 02015)
| Case Number | 02015 |
| Published date | 18 March 2010 |
| Year | 2010 |
| Adjudicated Party | Parvinder Singh |
| Procedure Type | Naming Case (Phone-Paid Services Authority) |
THE CODE COMPLIANCE PANEL OF PHONEPAYPLUS
TRIBUNAL DECISION
Thursday 4 March 2010
TRIBUNAL SITTING No. 48/ CASE 4
CASE REFERENCE: 805605/JI
Associated Individual: Parvinder Singh
Service Provider: Enbel Limited
THIS CASE WAS BROUGHT AGAINST AN ASSOCIATED INDIVIDUAL
UNDER PARAGRAPH 8.9.4 OF THE CODE
BACKGROUND
PhonepayPlus had evidence suggesting that Mr Parvinder Singh was involved in a company
which had been subject to adjudication in relation to a serious breach, or series of breaches,
of the PhonepayPlus Code of Practice (11th Edition Amended April 2008) (‘the Code’).
The Tribunal considered a report prepared by the Executive in accordance with paragraph
8.9.4 of the Code and was minded to name Mr Parvinder Singh as an associated individual.
The Executive notified Mr Parvinder Singh of the procedure by way of letter dated 7 January
2010, confirming it was pursuing the naming procedure under the Code of Practice:
Paragraph 8.9.2f and g - Knowing involvement in a serious breach, or series of
breaches, of the Code
The Investigation
The Executive has conducted this investigation in accordance with paragraph 8.9.4 of the
Code.
The Executive sent a letter to Parvinder Singh on 7 January 2010, confirming the pursuance
of the naming procedure and enclosing documentation referred to in the letter.
A formal response to the letter was provided by Parvinder Singh on 14 January 2010, along
with a covering statement.
The Executive sent an email to Parvinder Singh on 21 January 2010, clarifying the
resignation date of his directorship of Enbel Limited.
Parvinder Singh sent a response email to the Executive on 27 January 2010, attaching call
logs for the period October 2007 to January 2008 for Enbel Limited.
On 29 January 2010, the Executive sent an email to Parvinder Singh acknowledging that the
majority of the calls made to the service in breach of the Code in relation to Enbel Limited
were made after Parvinder Singh’s resignation as Director of the company.
Parvinder Singh did not exercise his right to make an Informal Representation to the
Tribunal.
The Tribunal made a decision on the on the proposed sanction on 4 March 2010.
To continue reading
Request your trial