Patel v Oldham Metropolitan Borough Council and another
| Jurisdiction | UK Non-devolved |
| Neutral Citation | UKEAT/225/09 ,[2010] UKEAT 0225_09_1501 |
| Date | 2010 |
| Court | Employment Appeal Tribunal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
25 cases
-
Sheridan vs Peninsula Business Services,B Stern-Gillet
...should make this judgment on the basis of evidence as to the circumstances prevailing at the time of that decision. In Patel v Oldham BC [2010] IRLR 280, it was held by the EAT, the effect of an illness or condition forms part of the assessment of whether the effect of the original impairme......
-
Mr D Herry v Dudley Metropolitan Borough Council: 1303959/2015
...Number 1303959/2015 1300217/2016 Ginn -v- Tesco Stores Limited UKEAT/0197/05/MAA (EAT) Patel -v- Oldham Metropolitan Borough Council [2010] IRLR 280 Where there are two or more impairments, the combined effect of both must be considered by the tribunal in determining what the adverse effect......
-
Mr H Pope v WFL (UK) Ltd T/a Watsons Fuels: 3335546/2018
...Paterson v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis [2007] ICR 1522, EAT Patel v Oldham Metropolitan Borough Council and anor [2010] ICR 603, EAT Swift v Chief Constable of Wiltshire Constabulary [2004] ICR 909 Sullivan v Bury Street Capital Ltd UKEAT0317/19 Anyanwu and anor v South Bank St......
-
Mr G Docherty v Royal Mail Group Ltd: 4114284/2019
...is relied upon, account should be taken of 25 the cumulative effect of the impairments upon the claimant’s abilities (Patel v Oldham MBC 2010 IRLR 280). 134. Substantial means more than minor or trivial (section 212(1) Equality Act 2010). This reflects the general understanding that disabil......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
Unconscious bias and the medical model: How the social model may hold the key to transformative thinking about disability discrimination
...(EAT ), where it was held that the tribunal had beenmisdirected.25. The impairment must have lasted 12 months – see Patel v. Oldham MBC [2010] IRLR 280.26. SCA Packaging Ltd v. Boyle [2009] UKHL 37 was a landmark decision in which the House ofLords clarified the correct approach in relation......