PAUL McINNES Appellant against HM ADVOCATE
| Jurisdiction | Scotland |
| Judgment Date | 2005 |
| Neutral Citation | 2008 SCCR 869 |
| Date | 2008 |
| Year | 2008 |
| Court | Unspecified Court (Scotland) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
10 cases
-
Her Majesty's Advocate
...(supra), Lord Rodger at para 82). In determining whether a miscarriage had occurred, a "robust" test was required (McInnes v HM Advocate 2008 SCCR 869, LJG (Hamilton), delivering the Opinion of the Court, at para [20]) [64] The complainer's statement would be disclosed now as part of a clas......
-
Beattie v HM Advocate
...UKPC 46; 2008 SLT 993; 2008 SCCR 954; [2009] HRLR 3; [2009] UKHRR 46 McInnes v HM AdvocateSCUNK [2008] HCJAC 53; 2009 JC 6; 2008 SLT 941; 2008 SCCR 869; 2008 SCL 1271 McLeod v HM Advocate (No 2)SCUNK 1998 JC 67; 1998 SLT 233; 1998 SCCR 77 Manuel v HM AdvocateSC 1958 JC 41; 1959 SLT 23; 1958......
-
William Frederick Ian Beggs V. Her Majesty's Advocate
...out in Al Megrahi v HM Advocate at paragraph 219), or the test respecting non-disclosure set out by the court in McInnes v HM Advocate 2008 SCCR 869 at para [20]: "the Court is not entitled to adopt a test which depends simply on whether the denial of access might possibly have affected the......
-
Alexander Woodside V. Her Majesty's Advocate
...by this Court when it dealt with McInnes - see Opinion of the Court delivered by The Lord Justice General (Hamilton) [2008] HCJAC 53, 2008 SCCR 869 at paragraph 20. In addressing that particular formulation Lord Hope said at paragraph 24: "The Lord Justice General then said at the end of pa......
Request a trial to view additional results