Pauls Agriculture Ltd v Smith
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Court | Queen's Bench Division |
| Date | 1993 |
| Year | 1993 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
7 cases
-
Ramsarran v Attorney General
...- and even before the judgment is registered [See Electricity Supply Nominees Ltd v. Farrell and others [1997] 1 WLR 1149; Pauls Agriculture Ltd v. Smith (1993) 3 All ER 122]. 21 Costs are presumably incurred at different times during the course of a trial and the order for costs are made ......
-
Ramsarran v Attorney General
...- and even before the judgment is registered [see Electricity Supply Nominees Ltd. Farrell and others [1997] 1 WLR 1149; Pauls Agriculture Ltd. v. Smith (1993) 3 All ER 122]. 21 Costs are presumably incurred at different times during the course of a trial and the order for costs are made a......
-
Manohar-maharaj v Manohar-maharaj
...for taxation within the 3-month period and that such time limit was treated with a certain amount of “elasticity.” [See also Pauls Agriculture Ltd v. Smith [1993] 3 All E.R. 122, 125 d-e]. 61 In Papathanassiou a delay period of 3 months was not inordinate but a delay of 2 years 7 months was......
-
Trinbago Roofing and Construction Company Ltd v Attorney General and Toby
...other party to award a nominal or other sum in order to prevent any other party being prejudiced by such refusal or neglect. In Pauls Agriculture Ltd. v. Smith [1993] 3 All E.R. 122 this sentiment was confirmed where a taxation officer is empowered to reduce a bill to compensate for the pre......
Get Started for Free