Pavlides v Jensen
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 1956 |
| Date | 1956 |
| Court | Chancery Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
25 cases
- Parallel Media Group Plc v Asia PGA Berhad
-
Multinational Gas and Petrochemical Company v Multinational Gas and Petrochemical Services Ltd
...from enforcing established causes of action outside the scope of section 333 otherwise as the law permitted. 56The decision in Pavlides v. Jensen [1956] 1 Ch. 565 was also relied on by the respondents on this point. In my opinion, however, the claim in that case failed solely upon well-know......
-
Mr Waleed Abouraya (suing on behalf of himself and all other shareholders in the Second Defendant other than the First Defendant) v Ms Anja Sigmund and Others
...a director alleged to have negligently caused his company to sell to himself a valuable asset at a gross undervalue. He distinguished Pavlides v Jensen [1956] Ch 565 where a derivative claim alleging that directors had been guilty of negligence in selling a valuable asset at a gross underva......
-
Lawrence Ewan McGaughey v Universities Superannuation Scheme Ltd
...L.R. 4 Ch.App. 376, 386, opined that shareholders must put up with foolish or unwise directors. Danckwerts J. in Pavlides v. Jensen [1956] 1 Ch. 565 accepted that the forbearance of shareholders extends to directors who are “an amiable set of lunatics.” Examples, ancient and modern, abound.......
Request a trial to view additional results
7 books & journal articles
-
Bibliografie
...Ltd (1984) 1 BCC 99,068Panorama Developments (Guildford) Ltd v Fidelis FurnishingFabrics Ltd [1971] 2 QB 711 (CA)Pavlides v Jensen [1956] Ch 565Pender v Lushington (1877) 6 ChD 70Posgate & Denby (Agencies) Ltd, Re (1986) 2 BCC 99,352Prudential Assurance Co Ltd v Newman Industries (No 1) [19......
-
Begripstoeligting. Hoofstuk 2
...wyse uitgeoefen word,48 selfs al sou daardie besluite sy44 Wedderburn (1957) 198.45 Wedderburn (1957) 197-198.46 Pavlides v Jensen [1956] Ch 565 576.47 Wedderburn (1957) 198. Sien in die algemeen ook Boyle “The mino-rity shareholder in the 19th century: a study in Anglo-American legalhistor......
-
'n Regsvergelykende ondersoek. Hoofstuk 3
...French & Ryan 536ev; PalmerVol 2 par 8.813-8.814.79 Boyle en Birds 637-639; Farrar 451;Tolley’s company law 1216ev; Pav-lides v Jensen [1956] Ch 565; Prudential Assurance Co Ltd v NewmanIndustries (No 2) [1980] 2 All ER 841 871-877; Pennington 663ev;Gower 647; Palmer Vol 2 par 8.815.80 Sien......
-
A comparative analysis of derivative action in Cypriot company law: Comparison with English company law and the prospect of statutory reform
...is afforded to them in such proceedings, yet it provides noanswer on whether they should be the only ones able to sue derivatively.24. [1956] Ch 565, 569.25. Burland v. Earle [1902] A.C. 83.26. According to K.W. Wedderburn, ‘Shareholders’Rights and the Rule in Foss v. Harbottle’.15Cambridge......
Request a trial to view additional results