Payzu Ltd v Saunders
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1919 |
| Year | 1919 |
| Court | Court of Appeal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
170 cases
-
Strutt v Whitnell
...have been laid down in a number of cases and in particular in the decision of this court in the case of ( Payzu, Limited v. Saunders 1919 2 King's Bench, 581). Certainly if one takes passages from the judgment in that case and perhaps particularly from the judgment of Lord Justice Scrutton,......
- McAlister & Company Ltd; Pasuma Pharmacal Corporation
- Malaysian Rubber Development Corporation Bhd v Glove Seal Sdn Bhd
-
The Secretary of State for Health and Others v Servier Laboratories Ltd and Others
..."all reasonable steps to mitigate the loss consequent on the breach", as Viscount Haldane said in the British Westinghouse case. In Payzu, Ltd v Saunders [1919] 2 KB 581, the Court of Appeal held, per Bankes LJ at 588, that: "It is plain that the question what is reasonable for a person to ......
Request a trial to view additional results
3 firm's commentaries
-
E-Alert: The concept of abandonment in contracts for the sale of land
...Park Shopping Centre Pty Ltd (1989) 166 CLR 623. 16 Ogle v Comboyuro Investments Pty Ltd (1976) 136 CLR 444. 17 Payzu Ltd v Saunders [1919] 2 KB 581. The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific...
-
E-Alert: The concept of abandonment in contracts
...Park Shopping Centre Pty Ltd (1989) 166 CLR 623. 16 Ogle v Comboyuro Investments Pty Ltd (1976) 136 CLR 444. 17 Payzu Ltd v Saunders [1919] 2 KB 581. The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific...
-
The Weekly Roundup: Another Bank Holiday Edition
...1067 , CA, per Harman LJ at p.1072). (iv) Whether a claimant has mitigated their loss is a question of fact not law ( Payzu v Saunders [1919] 2 KB 581 , (v) The defendant bears the burden of proving that it was unreasonable for the claimant to take certain steps in the past or would be so u......
11 books & journal articles
-
Defects
...May [2009] hKCFI 570 at [39], per Burrell J. 343 he Columbus Co, Ltd v Clowes [1903] 1 KB 244 at 247–248, per Wright J; Payzu v Saunders [1919] 2 KB 581; Harvey v homas Brown & Sons Ltd [1920] QSr 25 at 39–40, per Cooper CJ; he “Solholt” [1983] 1 Lloyd’s rep 605. See also Chun Wo Building C......
-
Damages
...183 C Goetz & R Scott, “The Mitigation Principle: Toward a General Theory of Contractual Obligation” (1983) 69 Va L Rev 967. 184 [1919] 2 KB 581 (CA). Damages 1029 that offer and sued for damages when the market price for the goods in question escalated. Although the seller’s repudiation wa......
-
Mitigation, Avoided Loss, and Time of Assessment
...other party to the contract, accepting offers made by the other party, or even paying money to the other party.” 22 Payzu v Saunders , [1919] 2 KB 581 (CA) [ Payzu ]; Westland Investment Corp v Carswell Collins Ltd (1996), 179 AR 272 (QB); Proctor Crushing , above note 5 at paras 111–19. 23......
-
Table of cases
...177 Payne v Eagle Riedge Pontiac GMC Ltd, 2010 BCSC 1085 .................................. 62 Payzu v Saunders, [1919] 2 KB 581, 89 LJKB 17, [1918–19] All ER Rep 219 (CA) .............................................................................434, 437 PD v Allen, [2004] OJ No 3042 (SC......
Request a trial to view additional results