Payzu Ltd v Saunders

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1919
Year1919
CourtCourt of Appeal

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
175 cases
  • Strutt v Whitnell
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 5 February 1975
    ...have been laid down in a number of cases and in particular in the decision of this court in the case of ( Payzu, Limited v. Saunders 1919 2 King's Bench, 581). Certainly if one takes passages from the judgment in that case and perhaps particularly from the judgment of Lord Justice Scrutton,......
  • RTI Ltd v MUR Shipping BV
    • United Kingdom
    • Supreme Court
    • 15 May 2024
    ...effect full performance and, in contrast to our case, there was no conceivable loss that required indemnification. (b) Payzu Ltd v Saunders [1919] 2 KB 581 (“ Payzu ”) 83 The defendants contracted to sell in instalments 400 pieces of silk to the claimants, with delivery as specified by the ......
  • McAlister & Company Ltd; Pasuma Pharmacal Corporation
    • Malaysia
    • Federal Court (Malaysia)
    • Invalid date
  • Malaysian Rubber Development Corporation Bhd v Glove Seal Sdn Bhd
    • Malaysia
    • Supreme Court (Malaysia)
    • Invalid date
  • Get Started for Free
3 firm's commentaries
  • E-Alert: The concept of abandonment in contracts for the sale of land
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • 2 May 2020
    ...Park Shopping Centre Pty Ltd (1989) 166 CLR 623. 16 Ogle v Comboyuro Investments Pty Ltd (1976) 136 CLR 444. 17 Payzu Ltd v Saunders [1919] 2 KB 581. The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific...
  • E-Alert: The concept of abandonment in contracts
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • 11 May 2020
    ...Park Shopping Centre Pty Ltd (1989) 166 CLR 623. 16 Ogle v Comboyuro Investments Pty Ltd (1976) 136 CLR 444. 17 Payzu Ltd v Saunders [1919] 2 KB 581. The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific...
  • The Weekly Roundup: Another Bank Holiday Edition
    • United Kingdom
    • Mondaq UK
    • 5 May 2022
    ...1067 , CA, per Harman LJ at p.1072). (iv) Whether a claimant has mitigated their loss is a question of fact not law ( Payzu v Saunders [1919] 2 KB 581 , (v) The defendant bears the burden of proving that it was unreasonable for the claimant to take certain steps in the past or would be so u......
11 books & journal articles
  • Defects
    • United Kingdom
    • Construction Law. Volume II - Third Edition
    • 13 April 2020
    ...May [2009] hKCFI 570 at [39], per Burrell J. 343 he Columbus Co, Ltd v Clowes [1903] 1 KB 244 at 247–248, per Wright J; Payzu v Saunders [1919] 2 KB 581; Harvey v homas Brown & Sons Ltd [1920] QSr 25 at 39–40, per Cooper CJ; he “Solholt” [1983] 1 Lloyd’s rep 605. See also Chun Wo Building C......
  • Mitigation, Avoided Loss, and Time of Assessment
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Remedies: The Law of Damages. Third Edition Limiting Principles
    • 21 June 2014
    ...other party to the contract, accepting offers made by the other party, or even paying money to the other party.” 22 Payzu v Saunders , [1919] 2 KB 581 (CA) [ Payzu ]; Westland Investment Corp v Carswell Collins Ltd (1996), 179 AR 272 (QB); Proctor Crushing , above note 5 at paras 111–19. 23......
  • Table of cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Remedies: The Law of Damages. Third Edition Limiting Principles
    • 21 June 2014
    ...177 Payne v Eagle Riedge Pontiac GMC Ltd, 2010 BCSC 1085 .................................. 62 Payzu v Saunders, [1919] 2 KB 581, 89 LJKB 17, [1918–19] All ER Rep 219 (CA) .............................................................................434, 437 PD v Allen, [2004] OJ No 3042 (SC......
  • Damages
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Law of Contracts. Third Edition Remedies
    • 4 August 2020
    ...183 C Goetz & R Scott, “The Mitigation Principle: Toward a General Theory of Contractual Obligation” (1983) 69 Va L Rev 967. 184 [1919] 2 KB 581 (CA). Damages 1029 that offer and sued for damages when the market price for the goods in question escalated. Although the seller’s repudiation wa......
  • Get Started for Free