PCL and Others v The Y Regional Government of X

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Judgment Date2015
Neutral Citation[2015] EWHC 68 (Comm)
Date2015
Year2015
CourtQueen's Bench Division (Commercial Court)
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
14 cases
  • Pearl Petroleum Company Ltd and Others v The Kurdistan Regional Government of Iraq
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Commercial Court)
    • 20 November 2015
    ...order. 13 There have been developments since December 2014 while the parties have been resolving (with the assistance of the Court [2015] EWHC 68 (Comm)) defective service and then re-service, and preparing for, fixing and serving evidence for this hearing. The Respondent between September......
  • General Dynamics United Kingdom Ltd v State of Libya
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Commercial Court)
    • 18 January 2019
    ...focusing instead on a suggested distinction between adjudication and enforcement. 55 The issue in L v Y Regional Government of X [2015] EWHC 68 (Comm), [2015] 1 WLR 3948 was whether section 12 of the 1978 Act applied to an application to court made in the course of arbitration proceedings......
  • AELF MSN 242, LLC (a Puerto Rico Ltd liability company) v De Surinaamse Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.v D.B.A. Surinam Airways
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Commercial Court)
    • 14 March 2022
    ...All ER 206, SC(E)IMS SA v Capital Oil and Gas Industries Ltd [2016] EWHC 1956 (Comm); [2016] 4 WLR 163L v Y Regional Government of X [2015] EWHC 68 (Comm); [2015] 1 WLR 3948; [2015] 1 Lloyd’s Rep 483R (Hysaj) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Practice Note) [2014] EWCA Civ 1633;......
  • Aelf Msn 242, LLC (a Puerto Rico Ltd liability company) v De Surinaamse Luchtvaart
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Commercial Court)
    • 21 December 2021
    ...service and must not have applied to challenge jurisdiction within the requisite time period. See L v Y Regional Government of X [2015] EWHC 68 (Comm), para. 56–60. (2) It follows that the filing of the First Acknowledgment on 28th June 2021 was not an appearance within the meaning of sect......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT