Peacock v Amusement Equip. Company Ltd

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1954
Year1954
CourtCourt of Appeal

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
9 cases
  • Fitzsimons v Telecom Éireann
    • Ireland
    • High Court
    • 1 January 1991
    ...V JOHN ALLEN & FORD (OXFORD) LTD 1967 1 AER 542 MEADE V CLARKE CHAPMAN & CO LTD 1956 1 AER 44 PEACOCK V AMUSEMENT EQUIPMENT CO LTD 1954 2 QB 347 BAKER V DALGLEISH STEAM SHIPPING CO 1922 1 KB 361 Synopsis: DAMAGES Assessment Death - Dependants - Loss - Calculation - Widow - Remarriage - Ben......
  • Parry v Cleaver
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 5 February 1969
    ...of the Fund was not the accident but the bounty or charitable motives of the subscribers." 129 Peacock v. Amusement Equipment Co. Ltd. [1954] 2 Q.B. 347: As a result of an accident occurring while she was a passenger on a minature railway owned by the defendants the plaintiff's wife sustai......
  • Hay v Hughes
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 17 October 1974
    ...hand the gift by a deceased mother's children of one third of her estate to their stepfather in Peacock, -v- Amusement Equipment Co. (1954 2 Q B, 347) was, I think, a benefit of a kind which any juryman would say should not be treated as reducing the injury he had suffered by reason of his ......
  • Browning v War Office
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal
    • 20 November 1962
    ... ... I., 167 approved by this court in Peacock v. Amusemont Company , 1954, 2. C. B., 347: or by reason of insurance ... ...
  • Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
  • Cases referred to in 1965
    • Nigeria
    • DSC Publications Online Nigerian Supreme Court Cases. 1965 Preliminary Sections
    • 11 November 2022
    ...v. Kwaseko 3 W.A.C.A. 230. ........................................................... 189 Peacock v. Amusement Equipment Co. Ltd. (1954) 2 Q.B. 347. ................ 256 Pearl Mill Co. Ltd. v. Ivy Tannery Co. Ltd. (1919) 1 K.B. 78. ....................... 53 Phillips v. London and Southwes......